Vasarhelyi, P.: Implications of the INTERCONCEPT project for classification and indexing (1979)
0.01
0.01220762 = product of:
0.04883048 = sum of:
0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883048 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Few librarians and documentalists realise that the same term may have different meanings even within the same subject field in the context of different schools of thought, cultures, etc. By making explicit the concepts that authors are using - based on their explicit definitions, rather than just inferring meanings from the way they use key-words - it would become possible to determine which of the several concepts a term refers to is used in a given case. The INTERCONCEPT project, launched by UNESCO in 1977 is intended to demonstrate, among other that the solution to this problem could be facilitated by using a conceptual data bank, both in indexing and classification and also in information retrieval. It should be noted that this is only one of the aims of the INTERCONCEPT project, the final aim bing to promote international understandingby conceptual control and analysis in the field of social sciences
