Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Vinkler, P."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Vinkler, P.: ¬The institutionalization of scientific information : a scientometric model (ISI-S Model) (2002) 0.00
    5.9199263E-4 = product of:
      0.008879889 = sum of:
        0.008879889 = product of:
          0.017759778 = sum of:
            0.017759778 = weight(_text_:information in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017759778 = score(doc=817,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    A scientometric model (ISI-S model) is introduced for describing the institutionalization process of scientific information. The central concept of ISI-S is that the scientific information published may develop with time through permanent evaluation and modification processes toward a cognitive consensus of distinguished authors of the respective scientific field or discipline. ISI-S describes the information and knowledge systems of science as a global network of interdependent information and knowledge clusters that are dynamically changing by their content and size. ISI-S assumes sets of information with short- or long-term impact and information integrated into the basic scientific knowledge or common knowledge. The type of the information sources (e.g., lecture, journal paper, review, monograph, book, textbook, lexicon) and the length of the impact are related to the grade of institutionalization. References are considered as proofs of manifested impact. The relative and absolute development of scientific knowledge seems to be slower than the increase of the number of publications.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft "Current theory in library and information science"
  2. Vinkler, P.: Characterization of the impact of sets of scientific papers : the Garfield (impact) Factor (2004) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.5, S.431-435