Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 6050 technik %2f elektrotechnik%2c elektronik%2c nachrichtentechnik %2f nachrichtentechnik%3b telekommunikation %2f mustererkennung%3b bilderkennung%3b bildverarbeitung %28Anwendung in der nachrichtentechnik%29%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 6000 technik %2f elektrotechnik%2c elektronik%2c nachrichtentechnik %2f nachrichtentechnik%3b telekommunikation %2f mustererkennung%3b bilderkennung%3b bildverarbeitung %28Anwendung in der nachrichtentechnik%29%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 6050 technik %2f elektrotechnik%2c elektronic%2c nachrichtentechnik %2f nachrichtentechnik%3b telekommunikation %2f mustererkennung%3b bilderkennung%3b bildverarbeitung %28Anwendung in der nachrichtentechnik%29%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 6050 technik %2f elektrotechnik%2c elektronik%2c nachrichtentechnik %2f nachrichtentechnik%3b telekommunikations %2f mustererkennung%3b bilderkennung%3b bildverarbeitung %28Anwendung in der nachrichtentechnik%29%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 6050 technik %2f elektrotechniker%2c elektronik%2c nachrichtentechnik %2f nachrichtentechnik%3b telekommunikation %2f mustererkennung%3b bilderkennung%3b bildverarbeitung %28Anwendung in der nachrichtentechnik%29%22 2
-
Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Search trees for subject searching in online catalogs (1990)
0.00
3.9808187E-4 = product of: 0.007165474 = sum of: 0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.007165474 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of: 0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.021906832 = queryNorm 0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431) 0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.; Drabenstott, K.M.: Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users (1991)
0.00
1.4928072E-4 = product of: 0.0026870528 = sum of: 0.0026870528 = weight(_text_:in in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0026870528 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of: 0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.021906832 = queryNorm 0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679) 0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
- Abstract
- Subject queries were extracted from 3 universities' online catalogues and analysed to determine the extend to which they matched subject headings in the LCSH. Computer analyses show that nearly 25% of the subject queries entered by online catalogue users are exact matches of LCSH. Yet, manual analyses show that, even though a user matches or closely matches LCSH-mr, the citations retrieved by this vocabulary are not necessarily satisfactory. Sometimes the closest LCSH-mr is not at all pertinent to a user's topic of interest. This study presents reasons why close matches of LCSH-mr are not always satisfactory and suggests approaches to finding the best matches of the catalogue's controlled vocabulary