-
Walker, S.: Subject access in online catalogues (1991)
0.07
0.07317396 = product of:
0.19513057 = sum of:
0.047231287 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047231287 = score(doc=5690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690)
0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0154592255 = score(doc=5690,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690)
0.13244006 = sum of:
0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017656423 = score(doc=5690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690)
0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 5690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11478364 = score(doc=5690,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 5690, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5690)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Discusses some of the methods of subject access to on-line catalohues (OPACs) and argues that none are entirley satisfactory. Describes 2 methods for improving subject access: best match searching; and automatic query expansion application and discusses their feasibility. Mentions emerging application standards for information retrieval and concludes that existing standards are incompatible with most methods for improving standards
- Source
- OPACs and the user: Proc. of the 3rd Anglo-Nordic seminar, Apr. 90
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Walker, S.: ¬An evaluation of automatic query expansion in an online library catalogue (1992)
0.03
0.02936183 = product of:
0.07829821 = sum of:
0.029222867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029222867 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029945528 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019129815 = score(doc=2731,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- An automatic query expansion (AQE) facility in anonline catalogue was evaluated in an operational library setting. The OKAPI experimental system had other features including: ranked output 'best match' keyword searching, automatic stemming, spelling normalisation and cross referencing as well as relevance feedback. A combination of transaction log analysis, search replays, questionnaires and interviews was used for data collection. Findings show that contrary to previous results, AQE was beneficial in a substantial number of searches. Use intentions, the effectiveness of the 'best match' search and user interaction were identified as the main factors affecting the take-up of the query expansion facility
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 48(1992) no.4, S.406-421
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Walker, S.; DeVere, R.: Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues : T.2: Relevance feedback and query expansion (1990)
0.01
0.007379888 = product of:
0.059039105 = sum of:
0.059039105 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059039105 = score(doc=1816,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124912694 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.041294612 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1816, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1816)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval