Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wang, F."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Wei, J.; Wang, F.; Lindell, M.K.: ¬The evolution of stakeholders' perceptions of disaster : a model of information flow (2016) 0.02
    0.015035374 = product of:
      0.060141496 = sum of:
        0.060141496 = sum of:
          0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021732632 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.038408864 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038408864 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047248192 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:16:13
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.441-453
  2. Wang, F.; Wolfram, D.: Assessment of journal similarity based on citing discipline analysis (2015) 0.01
    0.0059894943 = product of:
      0.023957977 = sum of:
        0.023957977 = product of:
          0.047915954 = sum of:
            0.047915954 = weight(_text_:science in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047915954 = score(doc=1849,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.38499892 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study compares the range of disciplines of citing journal articles to determine how closely related journals assigned to the same Web of Science research area are. The frequency distribution of disciplines by citing articles provides a signature for a cited journal that permits it to be compared with other journals using similarity comparison techniques. As an initial exploration, citing discipline data for 40 high-impact-factor journals assigned to the "information science and library science" category of the Web of Science were compared across 5 time periods. Similarity relationships were determined using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis to compare the outcomes produced by the proposed citing discipline and established cocitation methods. The maps and clustering outcomes reveal that a number of journals in allied areas of the information science and library science category may not be very closely related to each other or may not be appropriately situated in the category studied. The citing discipline similarity data resulted in similar outcomes with the cocitation data but with some notable differences. Because the citing discipline method relies on a citing perspective different from cocitations, it may provide a complementary way to compare journal similarity that is less labor intensive than cocitation analysis.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.6, S.1189-1198
  3. Moskovitch, R.; Wang, F.; Pei, J.; Friedman, C.: JASIST special issue on biomedical information retrieval : Editorial (2017) 0.00
    0.0045276317 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = product of:
          0.036221053 = sum of:
            0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036221053 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.11, S.2525-2528
  4. Xu, S.; Zhai, D.; Wang, F.; An, X.; Pang, H.; Sun, Y.: ¬A novel method for topic linkages between scientific publications and patents (2019) 0.00
    0.0032015191 = product of:
      0.012806077 = sum of:
        0.012806077 = product of:
          0.025612153 = sum of:
            0.025612153 = weight(_text_:science in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025612153 = score(doc=5360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is increasingly important to build topic linkages between scientific publications and patents for the purpose of understanding the relationships between science and technology. Previous studies on the linkages mainly focus on the analysis of nonpatent references on the front page of patents, or the resulting citation-link networks, but with unsatisfactory performance. In the meanwhile, abundant mentioned entities in the scholarly articles and patents further complicate topic linkages. To deal with this situation, a novel statistical entity-topic model (named the CCorrLDA2 model), armed with the collapsed Gibbs sampling inference algorithm, is proposed to discover the hidden topics respectively from the academic articles and patents. In order to reduce the negative impact on topic similarity calculation, word tokens and entity mentions are grouped by the Brown clustering method. Then a topic linkages construction problem is transformed into the well-known optimal transportation problem after topic similarity is calculated on the basis of symmetrized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Extensive experimental results indicate that our approach is feasible to build topic linkages with more superior performance than the counterparts.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.9, S.1026-1042
  5. Zhai, Y; Ding, Y.; Wang, F.: Measuring the diffusion of an innovation : a citation analysis (2018) 0.00
    0.002716579 = product of:
      0.010866316 = sum of:
        0.010866316 = product of:
          0.021732632 = sum of:
            0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021732632 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.3, S.368-379
  6. Shen, X.-L.; Li, Y.-J.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, F.: Knowledge withholding in online knowledge spaces : social deviance behavior and secondary control perspective (2019) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=5016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.4, S.385-401
  7. Lee, J.; Oh, S.; Dong, H.; Wang, F.; Burnett, G.: Motivations for self-archiving on an academic social networking site : a study on researchgate (2019) 0.00
    0.0022638158 = product of:
      0.009055263 = sum of:
        0.009055263 = product of:
          0.018110527 = sum of:
            0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018110527 = score(doc=5249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047248192 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.6, S.563-574