Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wang, T."
  1. Luo, Z.; Yu, Y.; Osborne, M.; Wang, T.: Structuring tweets for improving Twitter search (2015) 0.01 
    0.014593512 = product of:
  0.06810305 = sum of:
    0.017681172 = weight(_text_:web in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017681172 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09807335 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
    0.010232029 = weight(_text_:information in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010232029 = score(doc=2335,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
    0.04018985 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04018985 = score(doc=2335,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.442117 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Spam and wildly varying documents make searching in Twitter challenging. Most Twitter search systems generally treat a Tweet as a plain text when modeling relevance. However, a series of conventions allows users to Tweet in structural ways using a combination of different blocks of texts. These blocks include plain texts, hashtags, links, mentions, etc. Each block encodes a variety of communicative intent and the sequence of these blocks captures changing discourse. Previous work shows that exploiting the structural information can improve the structured documents (e.g., web pages) retrieval. In this study we utilize the structure of Tweets, induced by these blocks, for Twitter retrieval and Twitter opinion retrieval. For Twitter retrieval, a set of features, derived from the blocks of text and their combinations, is used into a learning-to-rank scenario. We show that structuring Tweets can achieve state-of-the-art performance. Our approach does not rely on social media features, but when we do add this additional information, performance improves significantly. For Twitter opinion retrieval, we explore the question of whether structural information derived from the body of Tweets and opinionatedness ratings of Tweets can improve performance. Experimental results show that retrieval using a novel unsupervised opinionatedness feature based on structuring Tweets achieves comparable performance with a supervised method using manually tagged Tweets. Topic-related specific structured Tweet sets are shown to help with query-dependent opinion retrieval.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2522-2539
  2. Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016) 0.00 
    0.0031900802 = product of:
  0.02233056 = sum of:
    0.0141449375 = weight(_text_:web in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0141449375 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09807335 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
    0.008185623 = weight(_text_:information in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008185623 = score(doc=2671,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been a rapid growth of user-generated data in collaborative tagging (a.k.a. folksonomy-based) systems due to the prevailing of Web 2.0 communities. To effectively assist users to find their desired resources, it is critical to understand user behaviors and preferences. Tag-based profile techniques, which model users and resources by a vector of relevant tags, are widely employed in folksonomy-based systems. This is mainly because that personalized search and recommendations can be facilitated by measuring relevance between user profiles and resource profiles. However, conventional measurements neglect the sentiment aspect of user-generated tags. In fact, tags can be very emotional and subjective, as users usually express their perceptions and feelings about the resources by tags. Therefore, it is necessary to take sentiment relevance into account into measurements. In this paper, we present a novel generic framework SenticRank to incorporate various sentiment information to various sentiment-based information for personalized search by user profiles and resource profiles. In this framework, content-based sentiment ranking and collaborative sentiment ranking methods are proposed to obtain sentiment-based personalized ranking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work of integrating sentiment information to address the problem of the personalized tag-based search in collaborative tagging systems. Moreover, we compare the proposed sentiment-based personalized search with baselines in the experiments, the results of which have verified the effectiveness of the proposed framework. In addition, we study the influences by popular sentiment dictionaries, and SenticNet is the most prominent knowledge base to boost the performance of personalized search in folksonomy.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.61-72
  3. Ru, C.; Tang, J.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Wang, T.: Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction (2018) 0.00 
    0.0029009073 = product of:
  0.02030635 = sum of:
    0.0051160143 = weight(_text_:information in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051160143 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
    0.015190336 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015190336 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0909032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.4, S.593-608
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Lund, B.D.; Wang, T.; Mannuru, N.R.; Nie, B.; Shimray, S.; Wang, Z.: ChatGPT and a new academic reality : artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023) 0.00 
    4.3851556E-4 = product of:
  0.0061392174 = sum of:
    0.0061392174 = weight(_text_:information in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061392174 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052754723 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030051488 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.5, S.570-581

Authors

Years

Themes