Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wang, X."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Walsh, J.A.; Cobb, P.J.; Fremery, W. de; Golub, K.; Keah, H.; Kim, J.; Kiplang'at, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Mahony, S.; Oh, S.G.; Sula, C.A.; Underwood, T.; Wang, X.: Digital humanities in the iSchool (2022) 0.01 
    0.010969057 = product of:
  0.0383917 = sum of:
    0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025594465 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03244785 = queryNorm
        0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
    0.012797233 = product of:
      0.025594465 = sum of:
        0.025594465 = weight(_text_:j in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025594465 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03244785 = queryNorm
            0.2482419 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  2. Wang, X.; Zhang, M.; Fan, W.; Zhao, K.: Understanding the spread of COVID-19 misinformation on social media : the effects of topics and a political leader's nudge (2022) 0.01 
    0.009307554 = product of:
  0.032576438 = sum of:
    0.021717625 = weight(_text_:j in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021717625 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03244785 = queryNorm
        0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
    0.010858812 = product of:
      0.021717625 = sum of:
        0.021717625 = weight(_text_:j in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021717625 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10310292 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03244785 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The spread of misinformation on social media has become a major societal issue during recent years. In this work, we used the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a case study to systematically investigate factors associated with the spread of multi-topic misinformation related to one event on social media based on the heuristic-systematic model. Among factors related to systematic processing of information, we discovered that the topics of a misinformation story matter, with conspiracy theories being the most likely to be retweeted. As for factors related to heuristic processing of information, such as when citizens look up to their leaders during such a crisis, our results demonstrated that behaviors of a political leader, former US President Donald J. Trump, may have nudged people's sharing of COVID-19 misinformation. Outcomes of this study help social media platform and users better understand and prevent the spread of misinformation on social media.
  3. Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024) 0.00 
    0.0018815757 = product of:
  0.013171029 = sum of:
    0.013171029 = product of:
      0.052684117 = sum of:
        0.052684117 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052684117 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14792371 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03244785 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.

Authors

Themes