Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wang, X."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024) 0.05
    0.053835407 = sum of:
      0.02089947 = product of:
        0.08359788 = sum of:
          0.08359788 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08359788 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23472176 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05148746 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.032935936 = product of:
        0.06587187 = sum of:
          0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06587187 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05148746 = queryNorm
              0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.
  2. Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.: Multidimensional scholarly citations : characterizing and understanding scholars' citation behaviors (2023) 0.02
    0.023289224 = product of:
      0.04657845 = sum of:
        0.04657845 = product of:
          0.0931569 = sum of:
            0.0931569 = weight(_text_:y in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0931569 = score(doc=847,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05148746 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Walsh, J.A.; Cobb, P.J.; Fremery, W. de; Golub, K.; Keah, H.; Kim, J.; Kiplang'at, J.; Liu, Y.-H.; Mahony, S.; Oh, S.G.; Sula, C.A.; Underwood, T.; Wang, X.: Digital humanities in the iSchool (2022) 0.02
    0.016467968 = product of:
      0.032935936 = sum of:
        0.032935936 = product of:
          0.06587187 = sum of:
            0.06587187 = weight(_text_:y in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06587187 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24777827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05148746 = queryNorm
                0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)