Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wang, X."
  1. Tian, W.; Cai, R.; Fang, Z.; Geng, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, Z.: Understanding co-corresponding authorship : a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview (2024) 0.04
    0.037087902 = sum of:
      0.021245897 = product of:
        0.08498359 = sum of:
          0.08498359 = weight(_text_:authors in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08498359 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.015842004 = product of:
        0.031684007 = sum of:
          0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031684007 = score(doc=1196,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05234091 = queryNorm
              0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship is becoming more and more common. To understand the practice of authorship credit sharing among multiple corresponding authors, we comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorships from the perspectives of countries, disciplines, journals, and articles. This researcher was based on a dataset of nearly 8 million articles indexed in the Web of Science, which provides systematic, cross-disciplinary, and large-scale evidence for understanding the phenomenon of co-corresponding authorship for the first time. Our findings reveal that higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship exist in Asian countries, especially in China. From the perspective of disciplines, there is a relatively higher proportion of co-corresponding authorship in the fields of engineering and medicine, while a lower proportion exists in the humanities, social sciences, and computer science fields. From the perspective of journals, high-quality journals usually have higher proportions of co-corresponding authorship. At the level of the article, our findings proved that, compared to articles with a single corresponding author, articles with multiple corresponding authors have a significant citation advantage.
  2. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.010637206 = product of:
      0.021274412 = sum of:
        0.021274412 = product of:
          0.042548824 = sum of:
            0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042548824 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  3. Teo, H.-H.; Wang, X.; Wei, K.-K.; Sia, C.-L.; Lee, M.K.O.: Organizational learning capacity and attitude toward complex technological innovations : an empirical study (2006) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Recent studies have found organizational learning capacity to be a key factor in influencing organizational assimilation and exploitation of knowledge-intensive innovations. Despite its increasing importance, the impact of organizational learning capacity an technology assimilation is not well understood. Distilling from extant works an organizational learning and technology assimilation, this study identifies four components of organizational learning capacity, namely, systems orientation, organizational climate for learning orientation, knowledge acquisition and utilization orientation, and information sharing and dissemination orientation. The authors subject these components to structural equation modeling analyses to better understand their structure and dimensionality. The analyses strongly support the proposed four major dimensions underlying organizational learning capacity. Organizational learning capacity, as a higher-order factor, has a significant impact an attitude towards organizational adoption of knowledge-intensive innovations. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
  4. Jiang, Y.; Zheng, H.-T.; Wang, X.; Lu, B.; Wu, K.: Affiliation disambiguation for constructing semantic digital libraries (2011) 0.01
    0.009013871 = product of:
      0.018027741 = sum of:
        0.018027741 = product of:
          0.072110966 = sum of:
            0.072110966 = weight(_text_:authors in 4457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072110966 = score(doc=4457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4457)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With increasing digital information availability, semantic web technologies have been employed to construct semantic digital libraries in order to ease information comprehension. The use of semantic web enables users to search or visualize resources in a semantic fashion. Semantic web generation is a key process in semantic digital library construction, which converts metadata of digital resources into semantic web data. Many text mining technologies, such as keyword extraction and clustering, have been proposed to generate semantic web data. However, one important type of metadata in publications, called affiliation, is hard to convert into semantic web data precisely because different authors, who have the same affiliation, often express the affiliation in different ways. To address this issue, this paper proposes a clustering method based on normalized compression distance for the purpose of affiliation disambiguation. The experimental results show that our method is able to identify different affiliations that denote the same institutes. The clustering results outperform the well-known k-means clustering method in terms of average precision, F-measure, entropy, and purity.
  5. Wang, X.; Erdelez, S.; Allen, C.; Anderson, B.; Cao, H.; Shyu, C.-R.: Role of domain knowledge in developing user-centered medical-image indexing (2012) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4977)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Reyes Ayala, B.; Knudson, R.; Chen, J.; Cao, G.; Wang, X.: Metadata records machine translation combining multi-engine outputs with limited parallel data (2018) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4010,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4010, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4010)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Yang, B.; Rousseau, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.: How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? : a comparative study between international and Chinese research communities (2018) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Fang, Z.; Costas, R.; Tian, W.; Wang, X.; Wouters, P.: How is science clicked on Twitter? : click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications (2021) 0.01
    0.007921002 = product of:
      0.015842004 = sum of:
        0.015842004 = product of:
          0.031684007 = sum of:
            0.031684007 = weight(_text_:r in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031684007 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05234091 = queryNorm
                0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)