Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weibel, S."
  1. Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995) 0.01 
    0.01364685 = product of:
  0.0272937 = sum of:
    0.0272937 = product of:
      0.0545874 = sum of:
        0.0545874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0545874 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17636093 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050362512 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    23. 7.1996 10:22:20
  2. Weibel, S.; Pearce, J.: ¬The changing landscape of networked resource description (1996) 0.01 
    0.008673161 = product of:
  0.017346323 = sum of:
    0.017346323 = product of:
      0.06938529 = sum of:
        0.06938529 = weight(_text_:authors in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06938529 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22959334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050362512 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on work undertaken by OCLC in the development of a core bibliographic description, for records and resources available on the Internet, sufficiently simple so as to be suitable for use by authors not schooled in conventional cataloguing. Referes particularly to the Dublin Core of 13 data elements designed to provide a description scheme to be included directly in WWW documents and to promote self describing documents on the net. Notes the work of the National Document and Information Service (NDIS) Project, and other, similar projects; including the Open Information Locator Project (http://www.dstc.edu.au/RDU/reports/oil/adl96.ps). Summarizes the work of the ALCTS Task Force on Bibliographic Access in the Electronic Environment in defining the problems and solutions associated with bibliographic control of electronic collections (http://www.lib.virginia.edu/alcts). Concludes with an update on the Internet Engineering Task Force Meeting, regarding: HTTP; HTML; Uniform Resource Names (URN) and Uniform Resource Characteristics (URC) (http://purl.oclc.org); and Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS) (http://www.w3.org/pub/www.pics)
  3. Bearman, D.; Miller, E.; Rust, G.; Trant, J.; Weibel, S.: ¬A common model to support interoperable metadata : progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities (1999) 0.01 
    0.007227635 = product of:
  0.01445527 = sum of:
    0.01445527 = product of:
      0.05782108 = sum of:
        0.05782108 = weight(_text_:authors in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05782108 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22959334 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050362512 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core metadata community and the INDECS/DOI community of authors, rights holders, and publishers are seeking common ground in the expression of metadata for information resources. Recent meetings at the 6th Dublin Core Workshop in Washington DC sketched out common models for semantics (informed by the requirements articulated in the IFLA Functional Requirements for the Bibliographic Record) and conventions for knowledge representation (based on the Resource Description Framework under development by the W3C). Further development of detailed requirements is planned by both communities in the coming months with the aim of fully representing the metadata needs of each. An open "Schema Harmonization" working group has been established to identify a common framework to support interoperability among these communities. The present document represents a starting point identifying historical developments and common requirements of these perspectives on metadata and charts a path for harmonizing their respective conceptual models. It is hoped that collaboration over the coming year will result in agreed semantic and syntactic conventions that will support a high degree of interoperability among these communities, ideally expressed in a single data model and using common, standard tools.

Authors

Types

Themes