Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0276622 = product of:
  0.1106488 = sum of:
    0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 5780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1106488 = score(doc=5780,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 5780, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5780)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Sets out some of the problems associated with cataloguing Internet materials. Outlines some of the projects underway devoted to establishing standards for naming and locating Internet resources. Cataloguers should focus on Internet materials of interest to their users. Recommends cataloguing electronic journals, important documents on the local server, and home pages of relevant organizations

0.019363541 = product of:
  0.077454165 = sum of:
    0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 1419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077454165 = score(doc=1419,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 1419, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1419)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports a study of Canadian libraries to determine the extent of the application of codes and standards for bibliographic cataloguing records for facilitating the sharing of cataloguing records. The research examined results of a 1992 national survey of Canadian libraries to determine the pattern of use of AACR2R; cataloguing rules for different formats of library materials in various sizes and types of libraries. Analysis of data suggests that smaller libraries with collection sizes of less than 100.000 volumes were less likely than larger libraries to be record contributors. Those cataloguing agencies that were contributing to potentially derivable copy tended to use AACR2R in the majority of cases, perhaps suggesting that the quality of original records being created by self selected respondents to the survey were largely to current standard

0.00424829 = product of:
  0.01699316 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=3230,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports on the International conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, which was held in Toronto, Canada, in 1997. The conference was desiged by the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (JSC) to assist the committee in determining whether, in view of the present and future trends in information resources and information management, fundamental rule revision is appropriate and, if so, what the nature and direction of those revisions should be. Outlines some of the issues raised in each conference paper and summarizes the discussions that led to the items on JSC's immediate action list