Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weinberg, B.H."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: Complexity in indexing systems abandonment and failure : implications for organizing the Internet (1996) 0.02 
    0.017657567 = product of:
  0.07945905 = sum of:
    0.022227516 = weight(_text_:of in 6119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022227516 = score(doc=6119,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 6119, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6119)
    0.057231534 = weight(_text_:systems in 6119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057231534 = score(doc=6119,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.47535738 = fieldWeight in 6119, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6119)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    The past 100 years have seen the development of numerous systems for the structured representation of knowledge and information, including hierarchical classification systems and with sophisticated features for the representation of term relationships. Discusses reasons for the lack of widespread adoption of these systems, particularly in the USA. The suggested structure for indexing the Internet or other large electronic collections of documents is based on that of book indexes: specific headings with coined modifications
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  2. Weinberg, B.H.: Library classification and information retrieval thesauri : comparison and contrasts (1995) 0.02 
    0.016343227 = product of:
  0.07354452 = sum of:
    0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 5538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05872617 = score(doc=5538,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 5538, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5538)
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 5538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=5538,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5538, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5538)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Thesauri-structured controlled vocabularies, designed for information retrieval-are compared with classification schemes developed for the arrangement of library materials and/or bibliographic records. The syndetic structure (BTs and NTs) within the alphabetic sequence of thesauri constitutes a hidden classification, but many thesauri include an explicit hierarchical display; some feature notation. The various structures and applications of thesauri are surveyed, with an emphasis on their increasing role in electronic information retrieval. The skills required for thesaurus construction are similar to those for the development of classification schemes. The distinction between these activities is expected to blur in the future.
  3. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996) 0.01 
    0.011281644 = product of:
  0.0507674 = sum of:
    0.020741362 = weight(_text_:of in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020741362 = score(doc=6940,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
    0.030026035 = product of:
      0.06005207 = sum of:
        0.06005207 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06005207 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
    Date
    8. 3.1997 20:22:25
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
  4. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The indexes to AACR2 and its 1988 revision : an evaluation (1990) 0.01 
    0.010040373 = product of:
  0.045181677 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=3592,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
    0.021231614 = product of:
      0.042463228 = sum of:
        0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 3592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042463228 = score(doc=3592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3592)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Compares and evaluates the indexes to the 1978 and 1988 editions of AACR2. The format of the index follows the recommendations of the major standards, but the indexer's use of chain index structure and omission of concrete topics create difficulties for cataloguers. Explains and illustrates the structure and gives examples of missing entries and cross-changes to the index with the goal of their adoption in the next edition of AACR.
    Date
    14. 1.1996 5:56:22
  5. Weinberg, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing : introduction (1993) 0.00 
    0.0028225419 = product of:
  0.025402877 = sum of:
    0.025402877 = weight(_text_:of in 8094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025402877 = score(doc=8094,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 8094, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8094)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  6. Weinberg, B.H.: American Society of Indexers : history, activities and relationship to ASIS (1993) 0.00 
    0.002661118 = product of:
  0.023950063 = sum of:
    0.023950063 = weight(_text_:of in 8817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023950063 = score(doc=8817,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 8817, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8817)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 19(1993) no.3, S.23-24
  7. Weinberg, B.H.: Why postcoordination fails the searcher (1995) 0.00 
    0.002489248 = product of:
  0.022403233 = sum of:
    0.022403233 = weight(_text_:of in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022403233 = score(doc=1942,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Postcoordination, in which terms are combined at the searching stage rather than at the time of indexing, has been the main form of database access since the 1950s. Reasons for the failure of postcoordinate searches include the absence of specified relationships between terms, the complexity of formulating Boolean searches, and the high frequency of terms in large databases. Recent writers on indexing electronic text have called for precoordination to enhance the precision of retrieval. Among precoordinate indexing structures, a book index with coined modifications is the most precise. The time and cost associated with such customized analysis will, however, limit its application in the electronic environment
  8. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The hidden classification in Library of Congress Subject Headings for Judaica (1993) 0.00 
    0.0024443932 = product of:
  0.021999538 = sum of:
    0.021999538 = weight(_text_:of in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021999538 = score(doc=6162,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    The syndetic structure of subject headings lists, in particular the broader/narrower term references, constitutes a hidden classification that may be converted to an explicit tree structure. Such a structure may be used to examine the hierarchy of LC subject headings (LCSH) and to compare them with that of Library of Congress Classification (LCC). Joseph Galron's compilation, 'Library of Congress Subject Headings in Jewish Studies (1991)', was analyzed for several features relating to the hierarchy of terms, and trees tructures were built for the deepest hierarchies: Jews, Judaism, Hebrew language, and Israel. These were compared with the corresponding LC classes. A hierarchy in LCSH may have more levels than the corresponding schedule in LCC. It is concluded that the conversion of the BT / NT references of subject headings lists into tree structures is a useful tool for examining the correctness of a hierarchy. Display of subject headings in tree-structure format can assist users in grasping the hierarchy of subject headings and in navigating online catalogs
  9. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The earliest Hebrew citation indexes (1997) 0.00 
    0.0021169065 = product of:
  0.019052157 = sum of:
    0.019052157 = weight(_text_:of in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019052157 = score(doc=86,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    The invention of the citation index was credited to Shepard (1873) and Shapiro described a legal citation index published in 1743. A similar index was embedded in the Talmud 2 centuries earlier (1546). The 1st Hebrew citation index to a printed book is dated 1511. The earliest Hebrew manuscript citation index, ascribed to Maimonides, dates from the 12th century. Considerable knowledge was assumed for users of these tools. The substantial knowledge of their compilers contrats with the semi-automatic production of modern citation indexes. The terms citation, quotation, reference, cross-reference, locator, and concordance are employed inconsistently in publications about Hebrew indexes. There is a lack of citation links between the secondary literature on Hebrew indexes and that of citation analysis
    Footnote
    Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.4, S.318-330
  10. Weinberg, B.H.: Indexes: a chapter from The Chicago manual of Style, 14th edition : a review (1994) 0.00 
    0.0021037988 = product of:
  0.018934188 = sum of:
    0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018934188 = score(doc=1425,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    The chapter on indexes in The Chicago Manual of Style serves as a standard for index format and as a self teaching tool for authors and novice indexers. Reviews the 14th ed. for logical sequence, accordance of the guidelines and rules with those of other manuals and authorities, and the quality of its index. It is found wanting in all these areas, but contains much useful information on the indexing process and book index format
  11. Weinberg, B.H.: Indexes to the journals of the American Jewish Historical Society : significance, coverage, and format (1999/10) 0.00 
    0.0016464829 = product of:
  0.014818345 = sum of:
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 5778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=5778,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 5778, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5778)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
  12. Weinberg, B.H.: Can you recommend a good book on indexing? (1998) 0.00 
    0.001330559 = product of:
  0.011975031 = sum of:
    0.011975031 = weight(_text_:of in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011975031 = score(doc=7142,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    This book is a compilation of 20 book reviews. Here, Weinberg comments on her own reviews, and on the reactions of those who have been concerned with her reviews

Types

  • a 11
  • m 1

Themes

Subjects

Classifications