Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0010017329 = product of:
  0.019032925 = sum of:
    0.019032925 = weight(_text_:und in 3940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019032925 = score(doc=3940,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055517614 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025048926 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3940, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3940)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)

Source

Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.65-67

7.1552355E-4 = product of:
  0.013594947 = sum of:
    0.013594947 = weight(_text_:und in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013594947 = score(doc=1801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055517614 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025048926 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)

Abstract

Benutzerfreundlichkeit und komplexe Funktionalität sollten bei modernen relationalen Datenbanken kein Widerspruch mehr sein. Allerdings schaffen nur wenige Hersteller diese Grätsche. Weit mehr Werkzeuge wenden sich an den spezialisierten Profi