Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Weller, K."
  1. Mainz, I.; Weller, K.; Paulsen, I.; Mainz, D.; Kohl, J.; Haeseler, A. von: Ontoverse : collaborative ontology engineering for the life sciences (2008) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=1594,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.2, S.91-99
    Type
    a
  2. Weller, K.; Stock, W.G.: Transitive meronymy : automatic concept-based query expansion using weighted transitive part-whole relations (2008) 0.01
    0.008849675 = product of:
      0.01769935 = sum of:
        0.01769935 = product of:
          0.026549023 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.3, S.165-170
    Type
    a
  3. Klein, R.N.; Beutelspacher, L.; Hauk, K.; Terp, C.; Anuschewski, D.; Zensen, C.; Trkulja, V.; Weller, K.: Informationskompetenz in Zeiten des Web 2.0 : Chancen und Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Social Software (2009) 0.01
    0.007585435 = product of:
      0.01517087 = sum of:
        0.01517087 = product of:
          0.022756305 = sum of:
            0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004032909 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=2826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.3, S.129-142
    Type
    a
  4. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.00
    0.004749654 = product of:
      0.009499308 = sum of:
        0.009499308 = product of:
          0.014248962 = sum of:
            0.0033269802 = weight(_text_:a in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0033269802 = score(doc=4515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.06305726 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
            0.010921981 = weight(_text_:h in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010921981 = score(doc=4515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.096073404 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.4, S.205-206 (C. Carstens): "Welche Arten der Wissensrepräsentation existieren im Web, wie ausgeprägt sind semantische Strukturen in diesem Kontext, und wie können soziale Aktivitäten im Sinne des Web 2.0 zur Strukturierung von Wissen im Web beitragen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich Wellers Buch mit dem Titel Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web. Der Begriff Social Semantic Web spielt einerseits auf die semantische Strukturierung von Daten im Sinne des Semantic Web an und deutet andererseits auf die zunehmend kollaborative Inhaltserstellung im Social Web hin. Weller greift die Entwicklungen in diesen beiden Bereichen auf und beleuchtet die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die aus der Kombination der Aktivitäten im Semantic Web und im Social Web entstehen. Der Fokus des Buches liegt dabei primär auf den konzeptuellen Herausforderungen, die sich in diesem Kontext ergeben. So strebt die originäre Vision des Semantic Web die Annotation aller Webinhalte mit ausdrucksstarken, hochformalisierten Ontologien an. Im Social Web hingegen werden große Mengen an Daten von Nutzern erstellt, die häufig mithilfe von unkontrollierten Tags in Folksonomies annotiert werden. Weller sieht in derartigen kollaborativ erstellten Inhalten und Annotationen großes Potenzial für die semantische Indexierung, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Retrieval im Web. Das Hauptinteresse des Buches besteht daher darin, eine Brücke zwischen den Wissensrepräsentations-Methoden im Social Web und im Semantic Web zu schlagen. Um dieser Fragestellung nachzugehen, gliedert sich das Buch in drei Teile. . . .
  5. Weller, K.: Kooperativer Ontologieaufbau (2006) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Weller, K.: Kooperativer Ontologieaufbau (2006) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Weller, K.; Peters, I.: Reconsidering relationships for knowledge representation (2007) 0.00
    0.0012674211 = product of:
      0.0025348421 = sum of:
        0.0025348421 = product of:
          0.007604526 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=216,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classical knowledge representation methods traditionally work with established relations such as synonymy, hierarchy and unspecified associations. Recent developments like ontologies and folksonomies show new forms of collaboration, indexing and knowledge representation and encourage the reconsideration of standard knowledge relationships. In a summarizing overview we show which relations are currently utilized in elaborated knowledge representation methods and which may be inherently hidden in folksonomies and ontologies.
    Type
    a
  8. Weller, K.: What do we get from Twitter-and what not? : a close look at Twitter research in the social sciences (2014) 0.00
    0.0011642005 = product of:
      0.002328401 = sum of:
        0.002328401 = product of:
          0.006985203 = sum of:
            0.006985203 = weight(_text_:a in 1388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985203 = score(doc=1388,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1388, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The state of Twitter research in the social science do main is investigated based on a set of 25 highly cited papers, identified with the Scopus database out of 370 social science publications on social media research. The analysis shows how social media research in the so cial sciences has risen since 2007. The selected top cited papers are analyzed concerning their domains, the applied methods and the underlying data in use. It is shown that different methods, both experimental and analytical are applied, and that some papers have started to combine different modes of analysis. The size of the datasets used for studying Twitter varies considerably across studies. Furthermore, central advantages of studying data collected from Twitter are pointed out and open challenges in working with these particular data are listed. Challenges include, for example, data access via the Twitter API or via third party tools, representativeness of datasets and sampling strategies and ethical issues.
    Type
    a
  9. Weller, K.: Ontologien (2013) 0.00
    0.0011202524 = product of:
      0.0022405048 = sum of:
        0.0022405048 = product of:
          0.0067215143 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=715)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  10. Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.00
    7.8417675E-4 = product of:
      0.0015683535 = sum of:
        0.0015683535 = product of:
          0.0047050603 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=4061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a