Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"White, M.D."
  1. White, M.D.: Questions in reference interviews (1998) 0.04
    0.044897087 = product of:
      0.089794174 = sum of:
        0.089794174 = sum of:
          0.046456624 = weight(_text_:n in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046456624 = score(doc=4720,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.23818761 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
          0.043337554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043337554 = score(doc=4720,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045236014 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4720, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article characterises the questioning behaviour in reference interviews preceding delegated online searches of bibliographic databases and relates it to questioning behaviour in other types of interviews/settings. With one exception, the unit of analysis is the question (N=610), not the interview. The author uses A.C. Graesser's typology of questions to analyse type of question and M.D. White's typology of information categories to determine the question's content objective; this is the first application of Graesser's typology to interview questions in any setting. Graesser's categories allow for a more subtle understanding of the kind of information need underlying a question. Comparisons are made between questions asked by the information specialist and those asked by the client. Findings show that the information specialist dominates the interview, about half the questions were verification questions and about 22% were judgemental questions or requests; all but four types of questions from Graesser's categories appeared in the interviews, but no new question types were discovered. Clients often phrase questions as requests. In content, both clients and information specialists focus on the subject and service requested, but the clients ask also about search strategy and output features. Both parties ask predominantly short-answer questions. Results are related to interface design for retrieval systems.
    Date
    2.12.2005 14:48:22
  2. Iivonen, M.; White, M.D.: ¬The choice of initial web search strategies : a comparison between Finnish and American searchers (2001) 0.02
    0.02413957 = product of:
      0.04827914 = sum of:
        0.04827914 = product of:
          0.09655828 = sum of:
            0.09655828 = weight(_text_:n in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09655828 = score(doc=4483,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19504215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045236014 = queryNorm
                0.49506366 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper uses a mix of qualitative and quantitative methodology to analyse differences between Finnish and American web searchers (n=27 per country) in their choice of initial search strategies (direct address, subject directory and search engines) and their reasoning underlying these choices, with data gathered via a questionnaire. The paper looks at these differences for four types of questions with two variables: closed/open and predictable/unpredictable source of answer (n=16 questions per searcher; total n=864 questions). The paper found significant differences between the two groups' initial search strategies and for three of the four types of questions. The reasoning varied across countries and questions as well, with Finns mentioning fewer reasons although both groups mentioned in aggregate a total of 1,284 reasons in twenty-four reason categories. The reasoning indicated that both country groups considered not only question-related reasons but also source- and search-strategy related reasons in making their decision. The research raises questions about considering cultural differences in designing web search access mechanisms.
  3. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.01
    0.0091932835 = product of:
      0.018386567 = sum of:
        0.018386567 = product of:
          0.036773134 = sum of:
            0.036773134 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036773134 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15840882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045236014 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45