Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %32003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongresse %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongress %2f trondheim %3.2008%3E%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22World wide web %2f elektronische bibliothek %2f information retrieval %2f kongresu %2f trondheim %3.2003%3E%22 2
-
Wilkinson, M.A.; Pettigrew, K.E.: Control of community information : an analysis of roles (1996)
0.00
0.0014122581 = product of: 0.019771613 = sum of: 0.019771613 = weight(_text_:information in 6953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.019771613 = score(doc=6953,freq=12.0), product of: 0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.029633347 = queryNorm 0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 6953, product of: 3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of: 12.0 = termFreq=12.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6953) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Explores the differences between information and referral agencies and online community networks from an information policy perspective and uses a framework proposed by Wilkinson (1992) to analyze the positioning of control within the 2 intermediaries under 6 facets: agency ownership and governance, funding, information flow, access, information ownership, and quality control. Existing community networks and information and referral agencies are used as examples to illustrate the arguments
-
Pettigrew, K.E.; Wilkinson, M.A.: Controlling the quality of community information : an analysis of the effects on dissemination of the differences between I&R agencies and community networks (1994)
0.00
0.0011280583 = product of: 0.015792815 = sum of: 0.015792815 = weight(_text_:information in 4006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.015792815 = score(doc=4006,freq=10.0), product of: 0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.029633347 = queryNorm 0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 4006, product of: 3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of: 10.0 = termFreq=10.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4006) 0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- The recent explosion of community networks, such as Freenets, across North America has prompted the information and referral community to question whether community networks are providing, in part, a duplicate service; what the implications of their growth might be in terms of service delivery to the public; and whether their expansion might threaten the security of support for I&R agencies. Examines an aspect of the nascent rivalry between community networks and I&R agencies: how they differ in their control mechanisms and consequent management of community information. Suggests ways the 2 types of organizations can work together to provide the public with accurate and comprehensive community information
- Source
- Information and referral. 16(1994), S.185-194