-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.02
0.017587014 = product of:
0.02638052 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.017556472 = product of:
0.035112944 = sum of:
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.791-810
-
Wilson, P.: Public knowledge, private ignorance : toward a library and information policy (1977)
0.01
0.01331103 = product of:
0.03993309 = sum of:
0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03993309 = score(doc=2592,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Contributions in librarianship and information science; no.10
-
Wilson, P.: Situational relevance (1971)
0.01
0.0117654 = product of:
0.035296198 = sum of:
0.035296198 = weight(_text_:information in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035296198 = score(doc=841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 9(1971), S.457-471
-
Wilson, P.: Unused relevant information in research and development (1995)
0.01
0.01152769 = product of:
0.03458307 = sum of:
0.03458307 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03458307 = score(doc=226,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Relevant information known to be available may go unused in research and development because of information overload or because its use is excluded by deliberate policy. Exclusion by policy shows that R&D is not, and does not aim at always being, efficient in the sense of fully reflecting all available relevant information. It may still be efficient relatice to chosen strategies of information use and non-use. Overload may be a sign of strategic error, or may be accepted as routine and normal
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.1, S,45-51
-
Wilson, P.: Some fundamental concepts in information retrieval (1978)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Wilson, P.: Communication efficiency in research and development (1993)
0.01
0.008151309 = product of:
0.024453925 = sum of:
0.024453925 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024453925 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- If communication in research and development is efficient, then the current cognitive situation in any specialty should fully reflect all available relevant information. Available evidence suggests that communication in R&D is not in that sense efficient, and a priori arguments seem to show that it could not be. But we try to show that the evidence and arguments are inconclusive, and that the question of effiency is an open one. It is also one which information science has an interest in pursuing
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.7, S.376-382
-
White, H.D.; Bates, M.J.; Wilson, P.: For information specialists : interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (1992)
0.01
0.0070592402 = product of:
0.02117772 = sum of:
0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 7742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02117772 = score(doc=7742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7742)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Wilson, P.: Subjects and the sense of position (1985)
0.00
0.0035661976 = product of:
0.010698592 = sum of:
0.010698592 = weight(_text_:information in 3648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010698592 = score(doc=3648,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.11757882 = fieldWeight in 3648, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3648)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- One knows one is in the presence of "theory" when fundamental questions of a "why" nature are asked. Too often it happens that those involved in the design of bibliographic information systems have no time for brooding. It is thus noteworthy when someone appears an the bibliographic scene who troubles to address, and pursue with philosophic rigor, fundamental questions about the way we organize information. Such a person is Patrick Wilson, formerly philosophy professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and since 1965, an the faculty of the School of Library and Information Studies, University of California, Berkeley. Bibliographic control is the central concept of Wilson's book Two Kinds of Power. It is represented as a kind of power-a power over knowledge. That power is of two kinds: descriptive and exploitive. Descriptive power is the power to retrieve all writings that satisfy some "evaluatively neutral" description, for instance, all writings by Hobbes or all writings an the subject of eternat recurrence. Descriptive power is achieved insofar as the items in our bibliographic universe are fitted with descriptions and these descriptions are syndetically related. Exploitive power is a less-familiar concept, but it is more important since it can be used to explain why we attempt to order our bibliographic universe in the first place. Exploitive power is the power to obtain the best textual means to an end. Unlike the concept of descriptive power, that of exploitive power has a normative aspect to it. Someone possessing such power would understand the goal of all bibliographic activity; that is, he would understand the diversity of user purposes and the relativity of what is valuable; he would be omniscient both as a bibliographer and as a psychologist. Since exploitive power is ever out of reach, descriptive power is used as a substitute or approximation for it. How adequate this approximation is is the subject of Wilson's book. The particular chapter excerpted in this volume deals with the adequacy of subject access methods. Cutter's statement that one of the objects of a library catalog is to show what the library has an a given subject is generally accepted, as though it were obvious what "being an a given subject" means. It is far from obvious. Wilson challenges the underlying presumption that for any document a heading can be found that is coextensive with its subject. This presumption implies that there is such a thing as the (singular) subject of a document and that it can be identified. But, as Wilson Shows in his elaborate explication, the notion of "subject" is essentially indeterminate, with the consequence that we are limited in our attempts to achieve either descriptive or exploitive power.
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilson, P.: Does research with statistics have more impact? : the citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling (2016)
0.00
0.00294135 = product of:
0.0088240495 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1233-1244
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? : evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 (2023)
0.00
0.00294135 = product of:
0.0088240495 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.5, S.582-593
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.00
0.00294135 = product of:
0.0088240495 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.8, S.941-953
