Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007)
0.00
0.004985286 = product of:
0.029911714 = sum of:
0.01667963 = product of:
0.050038885 = sum of:
0.050038885 = weight(_text_:21st in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050038885 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19722016 = queryWeight, product of:
5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03435263 = queryNorm
0.25372094 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013232084 = weight(_text_:internet in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013232084 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1014172 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03435263 = queryNorm
0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
- Content
- Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
