Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wolfram, D."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Wolfram, D.: ¬The power to influence : an informetric analysis of the works of Hope Olson (2016) 0.01
    0.012243311 = product of:
      0.024486622 = sum of:
        0.024486622 = product of:
          0.048973244 = sum of:
            0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 3170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048973244 = score(doc=3170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 3170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines the influence of the works of Hope A. Olson by conducting an ego-centric informetric analysis of her published works. Publication and citation data were collected from Google Scholar and the Thomson Reuters Web of Science. Classic informetrics techniques were applied to the datasets including co-authorship analysis, citer analysis, citation and co-citation analysis and text-based analysis. Co-citation and text-based data were analyzed and visualized using VOSviewer and CiteSpace, respectively. The analysis of her citation identity reveals how Dr. Olson situates her own research within the knowledge landscape while the analysis of her citation image reveals how others have situated her work in relation to the authors with whom she has been co-cited. This reflection of Dr. Olson's research contributions reveals the influence of her scholarship not only on knowledge organization but other areas of library and information science and allied disciplines.
  2. Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010) 0.01
    0.011144597 = product of:
      0.022289194 = sum of:
        0.022289194 = product of:
          0.04457839 = sum of:
            0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04457839 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:54:22
  3. Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018) 0.01
    0.009287165 = product of:
      0.01857433 = sum of:
        0.01857433 = product of:
          0.03714866 = sum of:
            0.03714866 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03714866 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.054837555 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22