Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998)
0.01
0.00780627 = product of:
0.027321944 = sum of:
0.021165324 = product of:
0.04233065 = sum of:
0.04233065 = weight(_text_:p in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04233065 = score(doc=1023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006156619 = weight(_text_:a in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006156619 = score(doc=1023,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03704574 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Since the 'Science Citation Index' emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. Discusses the citation representation of science: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy
- Type
- a
