Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wu, I.-C."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Wu, I.-C.; Liu, D.-R.; Chang, P.-C.: Learning dynamic information needs : a collaborative topic variation inspection approach (2009) 0.04
    0.0352697 = product of:
      0.0705394 = sum of:
        0.0705394 = sum of:
          0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039809994 = score(doc=3293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04536168 = queryNorm
              0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
          0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030729406 = score(doc=3293,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04536168 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For projects in knowledge-intensive domains, it is crucially important that knowledge management systems are able to track and infer workers' up-to-date information needs so that task-relevant information can be delivered in a timely manner. To put a worker's dynamic information needs into perspective, we propose a topic variation inspection model to facilitate the application of an implicit relevance feedback (IRF) algorithm and collaborative filtering in user modeling. The model analyzes variations in a worker's task-needs for a topic (i.e., personal topic needs) over time, monitors changes in the topics of collaborative actors, and then adjusts the worker's profile accordingly. We conducted a number of experiments to evaluate the efficacy of the model in terms of precision, recall, and F-measure. The results suggest that the proposed collaborative topic variation inspection approach can substantially improve the performance of a basic profiling method adapted from the classical RF algorithm. It can also improve the accuracy of other methods when a worker's information needs are vague or evolving, i.e., when there is a high degree of variation in the worker's topic-needs. Our findings have implications for the design of an effective collaborative information filtering and retrieval model, which is crucial for reusing an organization's knowledge assets effectively.
    Date
    2. 2.2010 19:22:51
  2. Wu, I.-C.; Niu, Y.-F.: Effects of anchoring process under preference stabilities for interactive movie recommendations (2015) 0.01
    0.009952499 = product of:
      0.019904997 = sum of:
        0.019904997 = product of:
          0.039809994 = sum of:
            0.039809994 = weight(_text_:f in 2130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039809994 = score(doc=2130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18080194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.01
    0.0076823514 = product of:
      0.015364703 = sum of:
        0.015364703 = product of:
          0.030729406 = sum of:
            0.030729406 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030729406 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15884887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04536168 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25