Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wusteman, J."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Wusteman, J.: Patently ridiculous (2004) 0.05
    0.052858673 = product of:
      0.105717346 = sum of:
        0.06497275 = weight(_text_:library in 2847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06497275 = score(doc=2847,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.4930085 = fieldWeight in 2847, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2847)
        0.0407446 = product of:
          0.0814892 = sum of:
            0.0814892 = weight(_text_:22 in 2847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0814892 = score(doc=2847,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2847, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2847)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Open Source Software movement has much to offer the library community. But can it survive the onslaught of patent applications?
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.231-237
  2. Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004) 0.03
    0.028895756 = product of:
      0.057791512 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
        0.027163066 = product of:
          0.054326132 = sum of:
            0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054326132 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
  3. Wusteman, J.: XML and e-journals : the state of play (2003) 0.01
    0.009475192 = product of:
      0.03790077 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 4781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=4781,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 4781, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4781)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Within the library world, there is a growing interest in the use of XML in journals, not least because of its implications for e-journal archiving. But what is actually happening in the commercial journals market? How far have XML and its related standards permeated the production of real commercial journals and how do publishers and other providers of journals see this area developing? This paper looks at the activities and future plans of a selection of publishers and aggregators in the STM journals market, although many of the comments relate to the entire journals arena.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 21(2003) no.1, S.21-33
  4. Wusteman, J.: XML to the desktop (2003) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=4774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 21(2003) no.2, S.238-245
  5. Wusteman, J.: Document Type Definition (DTD) (2009) 0.01
    0.006699973 = product of:
      0.026799891 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates