Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yakel, E."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Yakel, E.; Kim, J.: Adoption and diffusion of Encoded Archival Description (2005) 0.02
    0.020352896 = sum of:
      0.018274104 = product of:
        0.07309642 = sum of:
          0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 4812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07309642 = score(doc=4812,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4812, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4812)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0020787928 = product of:
        0.0041575856 = sum of:
          0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 4812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0041575856 = score(doc=4812,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4812, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4812)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, findings from a study an the diffusion and adoption of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) within the U.S. archival community are reported. Using E. M. Rogers' (1995) theory of the diffusion of innovations as a theoretical framework, the authors surveyed 399 archives and manuscript repositories that sent participants to EAD workshops from 1993-2002. Their findings indicated that EAD diffusion and adoption are complex phenomena. While the diffusion pattern mirrored that of MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), overall adoption was slow. Only 42% of the survey respondents utilized EAD in their descriptive programs. Critical factors inhibiting adoption include the small staff size of many repositories, the lack of standardization in archival descriptive practices, a multiplicity of existing archival access tools, insufficient institutional infrastructure, and difficulty in maintaining expertise.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.13, S.1427-1437
  2. Yakel, E.: Archival representation (2003) 0.00
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = product of:
          0.011086896 = sum of:
            0.011086896 = weight(_text_:s in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011086896 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Archival Science. 3(2003) no.1, S.1-25