Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yee, M.M."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.00
    0.0019282651 = product of:
      0.022175048 = sum of:
        0.010999122 = product of:
          0.021998243 = sum of:
            0.021998243 = weight(_text_:1 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021998243 = score(doc=735,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28
  2. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 3: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1995) 0.00
    0.0016527986 = product of:
      0.019007184 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=4503,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46
  3. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 2: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1994) 0.00
    0.0016527986 = product of:
      0.019007184 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=5945,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables: (1) contraction of a work (abridgements, condensations, digests, epitomes, outlines, chrestomathies, excerpts, extracts, selections); and (2) change in substance of a work (adaptations, dramatizations, free translations, novelizations, paraphrases, versifications, films or filmstrips of a text, musical arrangements, musical amplifications, musical settings, musical simplifications, musical transcriptions, musical versions, parodies, imitations, performances, reproductions of art works, revisions, editing, enlargements, expansion, updating, translation).
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22
  4. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 4: cataloging theorists and a definition abstract (1995) 0.00
    0.0015429651 = product of:
      0.017744098 = sum of:
        0.008164732 = product of:
          0.016329464 = sum of:
            0.016329464 = weight(_text_:1 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016329464 = score(doc=595,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.28205526 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.009579366 = product of:
          0.019158732 = sum of:
            0.019158732 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019158732 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46.