Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007)
0.01
0.013954377 = product of:
0.04186313 = sum of:
0.04186313 = product of:
0.08372626 = sum of:
0.08372626 = weight(_text_:indexing in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08372626 = score(doc=267,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19998005 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.052243195 = queryNorm
0.41867304 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is compared to descriptive bibliography, to enumerative bibliography and abstracting and indexing services, as well as to metadata created by Web search engines or nonprofessionals at sites such as Amazon.com. These four types of metadata are compared with regard to object of the description, functions, scope, number of copies examined, collective vs. individual creation, standardization, authority control, evidence, amount of descriptive detail, degression, time span the data is intended to last, and degree of evaluation.