Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Yee, M.M."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.03
    0.028787265 = product of:
      0.05757453 = sum of:
        0.05757453 = sum of:
          0.007654148 = weight(_text_:a in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007654148 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
          0.04992038 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04992038 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.03
    0.027640268 = product of:
      0.055280536 = sum of:
        0.055280536 = sum of:
          0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011600202 = score(doc=735,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
          0.043680333 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043680333 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
    Type
    a
  3. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 3: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1995) 0.02
    0.024089992 = product of:
      0.048179984 = sum of:
        0.048179984 = sum of:
          0.010739701 = weight(_text_:a in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010739701 = score(doc=4503,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
          0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037440285 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
    Type
    a
  4. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 4: cataloging theorists and a definition abstract (1995) 0.02
    0.024089992 = product of:
      0.048179984 = sum of:
        0.048179984 = sum of:
          0.010739701 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010739701 = score(doc=595,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
          0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037440285 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    4th in a series of articles dealing with the concept and application of 'work' in cataloguing. Discusses the general concept of 'work' regardless of format, based on the writings of cataloguing theorists. Identifies a number of different criteris used to define the concept of work including criteria to do with creativity and/or single personal authorship, content, text or symbol strings, medium, identity and representation, and interchangeability, as well as the concept of work as product. Proposes a number of functions to be carried out by the ideal definition of work, and concludes by offering a definition
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46.
    Type
    a
  5. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 2: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1994) 0.02
    0.023258494 = product of:
      0.04651699 = sum of:
        0.04651699 = sum of:
          0.009076704 = weight(_text_:a in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009076704 = score(doc=5945,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
          0.037440285 = weight(_text_:22 in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037440285 = score(doc=5945,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables: (1) contraction of a work (abridgements, condensations, digests, epitomes, outlines, chrestomathies, excerpts, extracts, selections); and (2) change in substance of a work (adaptations, dramatizations, free translations, novelizations, paraphrases, versifications, films or filmstrips of a text, musical arrangements, musical amplifications, musical settings, musical simplifications, musical transcriptions, musical versions, parodies, imitations, performances, reproductions of art works, revisions, editing, enlargements, expansion, updating, translation).
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22
    Type
    a
  6. Yee, M.M.; Laye, S.S.: Online public access catalogs (1996) 0.00
    0.0028703054 = product of:
      0.005740611 = sum of:
        0.005740611 = product of:
          0.011481222 = sum of:
            0.011481222 = weight(_text_:a in 7604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011481222 = score(doc=7604,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 7604, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Review article on OPACs from the users' point of view. Contains a list of 66 user studies
    Type
    a
  7. Yee, M.M.: Attempts to deal with the 'crisis in cataloging' at the Library of Congress in the 1940s (1987) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 6167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=6167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Yee, M.M.: ¬The concept of work for moving image materials (1993) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 8337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=8337,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8337, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    First in a series of articles dealing with the general concept of work as it applies to the cataloguing of materials. In a well designed catalogue, 2 items treated as the same work will display together and be represented as manifestations (editions) or copies of the same work to the user interested in a particular work. Discusses the concepts of work and related work as they apply to moving image works, and recommends their application to woving image works
    Type
    a
  9. Yee, M.M.: Manifestations and near-equivalents of moving image works : a research project (1994) 0.00
    0.0024857575 = product of:
      0.004971515 = sum of:
        0.004971515 = product of:
          0.00994303 = sum of:
            0.00994303 = weight(_text_:a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00994303 = score(doc=862,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The existence of different versions or manifestations of films has presented a challenge to cataloguers for some time. Reports a study, conducted using a random samp,e of 119 film works held by the Californis University at Los Angeles Film and Television Archive, of the frequency of occurrence of manifestations of films and the visible indicators, accessible to cataloguers, that are associated with these differences. Results found that continuity, or artistic and intellectual content, varies frequently: additionally, some works have added subsidiary matter or differences in language and sound track; and a total of 58% of works sampled had at least one instance of difference in artistic and intellectual content between 2 items. Only 8% were mentioned as having manifestations in standard reference sources. Visible indicators and physical format of films were found to be very unreliable indicators of actual difference in content. Length differences of 3 minutes or more, as found in 72% of titles, are the most reliable indicators of actual differences. This corresponds to findings for books, which indicate paging as the most reliable indicator
    Type
    a
  10. Yee, M.M.; Soto, R.: User problems with access to fictional characters and personal names in online public access catalogs (1991) 0.00
    0.0023678814 = product of:
      0.0047357627 = sum of:
        0.0047357627 = product of:
          0.009471525 = sum of:
            0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 7257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009471525 = score(doc=7257,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7257, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7257)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  11. Yee, M.M.: Two genre and form lists for moving image and broadcast materials : a comparison (2001) 0.00
    0.002269176 = product of:
      0.004538352 = sum of:
        0.004538352 = product of:
          0.009076704 = sum of:
            0.009076704 = weight(_text_:a in 5416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009076704 = score(doc=5416,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5416, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Moving Image Genre-Form Guide and Library of Congress Subject Headings are compared as sources of genre or form terms for moving image and broadcast materials. Based on the findings of this comparison, it is recommended that any library, media collection or archive that uses LCSH for the provision of topical subject access to moving images and broadcast materials strongly consider using LCSH for genre and form access to moving images and broadcast materials as well. A number of recommendations are made for improving LCSH as a tool for form and genre access to moving image materials and an exhaustive list of LCSH terms which are examples of a form or genre is appended.
    Type
    a
  12. Yee, M.M.: FRBR and moving image materials (2007) 0.00
    0.0020296127 = product of:
      0.0040592253 = sum of:
        0.0040592253 = product of:
          0.008118451 = sum of:
            0.008118451 = weight(_text_:a in 1684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008118451 = score(doc=1684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Yee, M.M.: System design and cataloging meet the user : user interfaces to online public access catalogs (1991) 0.00
    0.0014351527 = product of:
      0.0028703054 = sum of:
        0.0028703054 = product of:
          0.005740611 = sum of:
            0.005740611 = weight(_text_:a in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005740611 = score(doc=2782,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Current research on user interfaces to online public access catalogs is reviewed in an attempt to identify research methods and findings applicable to the design of effective user interfaces to online public access catalogs. A broad definition of user interface is employed which includes data structures, in addition to searching and indexing software. The following features of online public access catalogs are discussed: the demonstration of relationships between records, the provision of entry vocabularies, the arrangement of multiple entries on the screen, the provision of access points, the display of single records, and the division of the catalog into separate files or indexes. For each feature, user studies and other research on online public access catalogs are reviewed and those findings summarized which provide insight into user needs concerning that particular feature; issues are identified and directions for further research are suggested. Implications for cataloging codes and standards and system design are discussed
    Type
    a
  14. Yee, M.M.: Integration of nonbook materials in AACR2 (1983) 0.00
    0.001353075 = product of:
      0.00270615 = sum of:
        0.00270615 = product of:
          0.0054123 = sum of:
            0.0054123 = weight(_text_:a in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054123 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007) 0.00
    0.0011839407 = product of:
      0.0023678814 = sum of:
        0.0023678814 = product of:
          0.0047357627 = sum of:
            0.0047357627 = weight(_text_:a in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047357627 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a