Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1

Zumer, M.; Zeng, L.: Comparison and evaluation of OPAC end-user interfaces (1994) 0.00
```
2.35447E-4 = product of:
  0.00470894 = sum of:
    0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00470894 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
```
Abstract

Compares and evaluates the functional capabilities and interface characteristics of OPACs from the user oriented perspective, using a systematic framework. OPACs of OhioLINK and its 16 member libraries are the object of the investigation. The interfaces used 6 system software but showed a variety of features in access to OPACs, operational control, access points, search formulation control, and user assistance. Interface design alternatives are identified and qualitatively analyzed