Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhao, D."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005 : introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis (2008) 0.03 
    0.031558447 = sum of:
  0.026286744 = product of:
    0.105146974 = sum of:
      0.105146974 = weight(_text_:authors in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.105146974 = score(doc=2384,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.005271704 = product of:
    0.010543408 = sum of:
      0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.010543408 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052875843 = queryNorm
          0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Author cocitation analysis (ACA) has frequently been applied over the last two decades for mapping the intellectual structure of a research field as represented by its authors. However, what is mapped in ACA is actually the structure of intellectual influences on a research field as perceived by its active authors. In this exploratory paper, by contrast, we introduce author bibliographic-coupling analysis (ABCA) as a method to map the research activities of active authors themselves for a more realistic picture of the current state of research in a field. We choose the information science (IS) field and study its intellectual structure both in terms of current research activities as seen from ABCA and in terms of intellectual influences on its research as shown from ACA. We examine how these two aspects of the intellectual structure of the IS field are related, and how they both developed during the first decade of the Web, 1996-2005. We find that these two citation-based author-mapping methods complement each other, and that, in combination, they provide a more comprehensive view of the intellectual structure of the IS field than either of them can provide on its own.
  2. Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005) 0.00 
    0.0036901925 = product of:
  0.007380385 = sum of:
    0.007380385 = product of:
      0.01476077 = sum of:
        0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01476077 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Information science during the first decade of the web : an enriched author cocitation analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0031630222 = product of:
  0.0063260444 = sum of:
    0.0063260444 = product of:
      0.012652089 = sum of:
        0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012652089 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  4. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research fronts? (2007) 0.00 
    0.002635852 = product of:
  0.005271704 = sum of:
    0.005271704 = product of:
      0.010543408 = sum of:
        0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010543408 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052875843 = queryNorm
            0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Themes