Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhou, X."
  1. Zenz, G.; Zhou, X.; Minack, E.; Siberski, W.; Nejdl, W.: Interactive query construction for keyword search on the Semantic Web (2012) 0.03
    0.029899795 = product of:
      0.05979959 = sum of:
        0.05979959 = product of:
          0.11959918 = sum of:
            0.11959918 = weight(_text_:master in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11959918 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32877895 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04992923 = queryNorm
                0.36376774 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    With the advance of the semantic Web, increasing amounts of data are available in a structured and machine-understandable form. This opens opportunities for users to employ semantic queries instead of simple keyword-based ones to accurately express the information need. However, constructing semantic queries is a demanding task for human users [11]. To compose a valid semantic query, a user has to (1) master a query language (e.g., SPARQL) and (2) acquire sufficient knowledge about the ontology or the schema of the data source. While there are systems which support this task with visual tools [21, 26] or natural language interfaces [3, 13, 14, 18], the process of query construction can still be complex and time consuming. According to [24], users prefer keyword search, and struggle with the construction of semantic queries although being supported with a natural language interface. Several keyword search approaches have already been proposed to ease information seeking on semantic data [16, 32, 35] or databases [1, 31]. However, keyword queries lack the expressivity to precisely describe the user's intent. As a result, ranking can at best put query intentions of the majority on top, making it impossible to take the intentions of all users into consideration.
  2. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.01
    0.011838263 = product of:
      0.023676526 = sum of:
        0.023676526 = product of:
          0.04735305 = sum of:
            0.04735305 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04735305 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17484367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04992923 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas