Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0045874086 = product of:
  0.018349634 = sum of:
    0.018349634 = weight(_text_:information in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018349634 = score(doc=3350,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article addresses the invisible college concept with the intent of developing a consensus regarding its definition. Emphasis is placed an the term as it was defined and used in Derek de Solla Price's work (1963, 1986) and reviewed an the basis of its thematic progress in past research over the years. Special attention is given to Lievrouw's (1990) article concerning the structure versus social process problem to show that both conditions are essential to the invisible college and may be reconciled. A new definition of the invisible college is also introduced, including a proposed research model. With this model, researchers are encouraged to study the invisible college by focusing an three critical components-the subject specialty, the scientists as social actors, and the information use environment (IUE).

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.2, S.152-168

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.513-529

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 6008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=6008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 6008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6008)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.11, S.1487-1502

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 4771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=4771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4771)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1979-1991

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 1530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=1530,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1530, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1530)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.11, S.2248-2260

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1333-1347

0.0023169913 = product of:
  0.009267965 = sum of:
    0.009267965 = weight(_text_:information in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009267965 = score(doc=4018,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.146-157

0.001853593 = product of:
  0.007414372 = sum of:
    0.007414372 = weight(_text_:information in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007414372 = score(doc=838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09556833 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.054440062 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of LexiURL as a Web intelligence tool for collecting and analysing links to digital libraries, focusing specifically on the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Design/methodology/approach - The Web intelligence techniques in this study are a combination of link analysis (web structure mining), web server log file analysis (web usage mining), and text analysis (web content mining), utilizing the power of commercial search engines and drawing upon the information science fields of bibliometrics and webometrics. LexiURL is a computer program designed to calculate summary statistics for lists of links or URLs. Its output is a series of standard reports, for example listing and counting all of the different domain names in the data. Findings - Link data, when analysed together with user transaction log files (i.e. Web referring domains) can provide insights into who is using a digital library and when, and who could be using the digital library if they are "surfing" a particular part of the Web; in this case any site that is linked to or colinked with the NeLH. This study found that the NeLH was embedded in a multifaceted Web context, including many governmental, educational, commercial and organisational sites, with the most interesting being sites from the.edu domain, representing American Universities. Not many links directed to the NeLH were followed on September 25, 2005 (the date of the log file analysis and link extraction analysis), which means that users who access the digital library have been arriving at the site via only a few select links, bookmarks and search engine searches, or non-electronic sources. Originality/value - A number of studies concerning digital library users have been carried out using log file analysis as a research tool. Log files focus on real-time user transactions; while LexiURL can be used to extract links and colinks associated with a digital library's growing Web network. This Web network is not recognized often enough, and can be a useful indication of where potential users are surfing, even if they have not yet specifically visited the NeLH site.