Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR library reference model (2015) 0.01
    0.00600611 = product of:
      0.01801833 = sum of:
        0.01801833 = weight(_text_:im in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01801833 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1442303 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051022716 = queryNorm
            0.12492748 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2015 - Cape Town, South Africa in Session 207 - Cataloguing. Vgl. den Kommentar von H. Wiesenmüller [Mail vom 25.06.2015]: "hier etwas höchst Spannendes - eine knappe Darstellung des konsolidierten FR-Modells, auf das wir schon so lange warten, und das im kommenden Jahr in das weltweite Begutachtungsverfahren gehen soll: http://library.ifla.org/1084/. Ich muss das Paper selbst auch erst in Ruhe lesen, sehe aber beim schnellen Durchblättern mit Freude bestätigt, dass die Gruppe-3-Entitäten aus FRBR tatsächlich abgeschafft werden. Die FRSAD-Entität "Thema" (die für alles stehen kann, was Thema eins Werks ist) wird umgetauft in "Res" (von lateinisch "res", Sache) und steht für "any entity in the universe of discourse". Die Entitäten der Gruppe 2 heißen jetzt zusammenfassend "Agent" und teilen sich auf in "Person" und "Group", wobei letzteres Körperschaften und Familien umfasst. Neu eingeführt wird "Time-span". Auf den ersten Blick scheint das jedenfalls alles ganz gut durchdacht zu sein."
  2. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.00
    0.0046085827 = product of:
      0.013825747 = sum of:
        0.013825747 = product of:
          0.04147724 = sum of:
            0.04147724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04147724 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17867287 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.00
    0.004585033 = product of:
      0.013755098 = sum of:
        0.013755098 = product of:
          0.041265294 = sum of:
            0.041265294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041265294 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15433937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models propose user tasks as a way to address and categorize functions that a catalog should support. The user tasks are not harmonized among these models, but to do that, they should first be fully understood and analyzed, especially "select" and "identify." We decided to look at the FRBR user tasks from the perspective of interactive information retrieval (IIR). Several IIR models were reviewed and Ellis' and Belkin's models were chosen for further analysis and interpretation of FRBR "select" and "identify" tasks.
  4. Mercun, T.; Zumer, M.; Aalberg, T.: Presenting bibliographic families using information visualization : evaluation of FRBR-based prototype and hierarchical visualizations (2017) 0.00
    0.0028845975 = product of:
      0.008653793 = sum of:
        0.008653793 = product of:
          0.025961377 = sum of:
            0.025961377 = weight(_text_:online in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025961377 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1548489 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051022716 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    FrbrVis prototype can, at this time, be viewed online at: http://dijon.idi.ntnu.no/exist/rest/db/frbrvis/index.html. This is not the exact version that was tested as there have been some minor changes and the prototype labels were translated from Slovenian to English language.