Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

9.815871E-4 = product of:
  0.013742219 = sum of:
    0.013742219 = weight(_text_:information in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013742219 = score(doc=1511,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.052810486 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030083254 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

When the festschrift volume was conceived, I was asked to contribute to the volume because of my professional association with Professor A. Neelameghan (AN), who was my teacher at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC) established by Dr S.R. Ranganathan in 1962. We have co-authored papers for conferences and periodicals and he has been a mentor for my own research. I am delighted to contribute this article based on interviews and discussions with him. Prof. Neelameghan (AN) has had a very distinguished professional career with a broad range of interests including, library and information science education, information systems and services, information policy, management, industrial information services, database design, knowledge organization and related tools. He joined Dr. S.R. Ranganathan in 1962 at the DRTC in Bangalore, India, where he made prolific contributions to research, especially in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad

5.173418E-4 = product of:
  0.0072427844 = sum of:
    0.0072427844 = weight(_text_:information in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072427844 = score(doc=206,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052810486 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030083254 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates one type of video surrogate, storyboards, in terms of their ability to summarize and communicate the themes of arts-related videos. An HTML interface containing the storyboards, videos, and instructions was developed and run in a standard browser. Three phases-consisting of storyboard evaluation, full-length video evaluation, and their comparison-were completed by each user for three different videos. The data were analyzed for issues relating to keywords, summaries, and recognition of visual style for both the storyboards and the full-length videos. The linear sequence and narrative structure of storyboards are questioned, and a three-tiered model is proposed. The first layer consists of keyframes representing the "entity" and "action" of the video's central theme, the second layer consists of "entity" and "action" keyframes with regard to background or supporting information, and the third layer is composed of keyframes representing attributes, locations, and time periods. This structure facilitates the identification of appropriate keyframes for storyboards, eliminating redundant or peripheral images, and improves the storyboard's ability to communicate the essential message of videos. The tiered model is motivated and supported by the user study as well as current research on video surrogates and classical indexing theory.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.5, S.629-644