Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.01
0.010561975 = product of:
0.031685922 = sum of:
0.0073453314 = weight(_text_:in in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073453314 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06109367 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.02434059 = product of:
0.04868118 = sum of:
0.04868118 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04868118 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15727912 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04491341 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
