Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.06
0.057019167 = product of:
0.11403833 = sum of:
0.11403833 = sum of:
0.037878115 = weight(_text_:2 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037878115 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17352746 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.07026566 = queryNorm
0.2182831 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4695914 = idf(docFreq=10170, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.076160215 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076160215 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24605836 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07026566 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
