Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013849026 = product of:
  0.041547075 = sum of:
    0.013115887 = weight(_text_:in in 5990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013115887 = score(doc=5990,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5990, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5990)
    0.02843119 = weight(_text_:und in 5990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02843119 = score(doc=5990,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5990, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5990)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Das Buch ist der Versuch, die Dichotomie zwischen Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften mit einer allgemeinen Theorie des Geistes zu überwinden. Auf diesem Hintergrund wird u.a. gezeigt, dass Adorno und Habermas theoretische Schnittmengen mit Einstein und Heisenberg haben, die in den bisherigen Debatten übersehen wurden. M.a.W.: Dass man mit Elektronen nicht reden kann, schließt eine methodologische Einheit nicht aus.

BK

30.30 (Naturwissenschaften in Beziehung zu anderen Fachgebieten)

Classification

30.30 (Naturwissenschaften in Beziehung zu anderen Fachgebieten)

Content

"Hier wird gleichermaßen präzise wie fachlich fundiert nachgewiesen, dass geistige Prozesse zwar neuronale Grundlagen benötigen, aber nicht auf sie zurückgeführt werden können. Mit einem semantisch basierten Kognitionsmodell vollzieht der Autor auch in den Diskussionen über die Einheit der Wissenschaften einen Paradigmenwechsel, mit Folgen bis in die KI-Forschung." (Prof. Dr. med. B. Fischer) Vgl. auch: D'Avis, W.: Denkende Maschinen. [27. September 2020]. In: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Denkende-Maschinen-4910957.html?seite=all.

Series

Gesellschaftsforschung und Kritik

0.008486142 = product of:
  0.025458427 = sum of:
    0.005354538 = weight(_text_:in in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005354538 = score(doc=4275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
    0.020103889 = weight(_text_:und in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020103889 = score(doc=4275,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Die beliebte Diagnose der "Wissensgesellschaft" verdeckt, dass keineswegs geklärt scheint, von welchem Wissen hier die Rede ist. Vor der zeitdiagnostischen Analyse muss daher in epistemologischer Hinsicht eine kritische, transdisziplinär angelegte Begriffsarbeit stehen. Bleibt dies aus, prägen weiter zahllebige Mythen unser Wissen vom Wissen; der graue Schwan steht dann bildhaft für jenen eigenartigen Zwang, diesbezüglich Zentrales leichthin zu ignorieren: Weder besteht Wissen aus einem geheimnisvollen physikalischen Stoff Information, der beliebig zwischen unterschiedlich strukturierten Systemen hin- und her übertragen oder von diesen umstandslos gespeichert werden könnte, noch ist es sinnvoll als Gut, Rohstoff oder gar Ware zu begreifen. Wissen generiert den Erscheinungen der Welt kognitiv und kommunikativ ihre (stabile) Bedeutung.

0.007833069 = product of:
  0.023499206 = sum of:
    0.010096614 = weight(_text_:in in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010096614 = score(doc=783,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
    0.013402591 = weight(_text_:und in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013402591 = score(doc=783,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The great dream of philosophers and scientists for millennia has been to give us a complete account of the order of things. A powerful articulation of such a dream in this century has been found in the idea of a unity of science. With this manifesto, John Dupre systematically attacks the ideal of scientific unity by showing how its underlying assumptions are at odds with the central conclusions of science itself. In its stead, the author gives us a metaphysics much more in keeping with what science tells us about the world. Elegantly written and compellingly argued, this provocative book will be important reading for all philosophers and scholars of science. Dupre's book is original, lucid and confident, without being eccentric, polemical or arrogant. It deserves close attention...Dupre insists that there is no general scientific method, process, or attitude...He pins down the notion of the unity of science as a form of scientism appropriate only to a Utopia or to totalitarianism. He notes that 'paradoxically, with the disunity of science comes a kind of unity of knowledge.' That is why, to my mind, this is just the kind of philosophical teaching that is needed to close the gap between the two cultures. -- John Ziman Nature The thesis of 'disorder' has revolutionary implications for the practice of science...[This book] should be read by every student of the subject as an antidote to current philosophical correctness, and it should indeed suggest to professionals that many of the fashionable empires of analytic philosophy as well as philosophy of science are not well-clothed. -- Mary Hesse International Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

BK

30.02 (Philosophie und Theorie der Naturwissenschaften)

Classification

30.02 (Philosophie und Theorie der Naturwissenschaften)

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 40(2013) no.2, S-149-151 (Elizabeth Milonas); vgl. http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_40_2013_2_g.pdf.

LCSH

Chaotic behavior in systems ; Reductionism ; Determinism (Philosophy)

Subject

Chaotic behavior in systems ; Reductionism ; Determinism (Philosophy)

0.007382172 = product of:
  0.022146516 = sum of:
    0.008743925 = weight(_text_:in in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008743925 = score(doc=3270,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.14725187 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
    0.013402591 = weight(_text_:und in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013402591 = score(doc=3270,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

We live in a society that is awash with information, but few of us really understand what information is. In this Very Short Introduction, one of the world's leading authorities on the philosophy of information and on information ethics, Luciano Floridi, offers an illuminating exploration of information as it relates to both philosophy and science. He discusses the roots of the concept of information in mathematics and science, and considers the role of information in several fields, including biology. Floridi also discusses concepts such as "Infoglut" (too much information to process) and the emergence of an information society, and he addresses the nature of information as a communication process and its place as a physical phenomenon. Perhaps more important, he explores information's meaning and value, and ends by considering the broader social and ethical issues relating to information, including problems surrounding accessibility, privacy, ownership, copyright, and open source. This book helps us understand the true meaning of the concept and how it can be used to understand our world. About the Series: Combining authority with wit, accessibility, and style, Very Short Introductions offer an introduction to some of life's most interesting topics. Written by experts for the newcomer, they demonstrate the finest contemporary thinking about the central problems and issues in hundreds of key topics, from philosophy to Freud, quantum theory to Islam.

BK

06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)

Classification

06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)

Series

Very short introductions : stimulating ways in to new subjects ; 225