Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.06535297 = product of:
  0.18516673 = sum of:
    0.0681287 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0681287 = score(doc=158,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13509747 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.03199099 = weight(_text_:buch in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03199099 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11009143 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.010281056 = weight(_text_:und in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010281056 = score(doc=158,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.052480873 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.014703666 = product of:
      0.029407332 = sum of:
        0.029407332 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029407332 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10555225 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023678783 = queryNorm
            0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03003116 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03003116 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.28154406 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.03003116 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03003116 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.28154406 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
  0.3529412 = coord(6/17)

Classification

AN 96000: Allgemeines / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft

RSWK

Informationsverhalten / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft

RVK

AN 96000: Allgemeines / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft

Subject

Informationsverhalten / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft

0.008438274 = product of:
  0.047816887 = sum of:
    0.021235235 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021235235 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.1990817 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
    0.021235235 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021235235 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10666593 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.1990817 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
    0.005346417 = product of:
      0.021385668 = sum of:
        0.021385668 = weight(_text_:quality in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021385668 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10704308 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5206327 = idf(docFreq=1307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023678783 = queryNorm
            0.19978562 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5206327 = idf(docFreq=1307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.1764706 = coord(3/17)

Abstract

"Thomson Reuters' citation indexes i.e. SCI, SSCI and AHCI are said to be "authoritative". Due to the huge influence of these databases on global academic evaluation of productivity and impact, Terje Tüür-Fröhlich decided to conduct case studies on the data quality of Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) records. Tüür-Fröhlich investigated articles from social science and law. The main findings: SSCI records contain tremendous amounts of "trivial errors", not only misspellings and typos as previously mentioned in bibliometrics and scientometrics literature. But Tüür-Fröhlich's research documented fatal errors which have not been mentioned in the scientometrics literature yet at all. Tüür-Fröhlich found more than 80 fatal mutations and mutilations of Pierre Bourdieu (e.g. "Atkinson" or "Pierre, B. and "Pierri, B."). SSCI even generated zombie references (phantom authors and works) by data fields' confusion - a deadly sin for a database producer - as fragments of Patent Laws were indexed as fictional author surnames/initials. Additionally, horrific OCR-errors (e.g. "nuxure" instead of "Nature" as journal title) were identified. Tüür-Fröhlich´s extensive quantitative case study of an article of the Harvard Law Review resulted in a devastating finding: only 1% of all correct references from the original article were indexed by SSCI without any mistake or error. Many scientific communication experts and database providers' believe that errors in databanks are of less importance: There are many errors, yes - but they would counterbalance each other, errors would not result in citation losses and would not bear any effect on retrieval and evaluation outcomes. Terje Tüür-Fröhlich claims the contrary: errors and inconsistencies are not evenly distributed but linked with languages biases and publication cultures."

Series

Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.69

0.0056760903 = product of:
  0.048246767 = sum of:
    0.03199099 = weight(_text_:buch in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03199099 = score(doc=568,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.11009143 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
    0.016255777 = weight(_text_:und in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016255777 = score(doc=568,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.052480873 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
  0.11764706 = coord(2/17)

Abstract

Mittlerweile sind mehr als zehn Jahre seit der Gründung der Wikipedia vergangen. Die kollaborativ zusammengestellte Online-Enzyklopädie blickt auf eine beispiellose Erfolgsgeschichte zurück und hat inzwischen sogar viele klassische Lexika das Fürchten gelehrt. Aber: Es gibt gar nicht die eine Wikipedia! Stattdessen handelt es sich bei dem Projekt um hunderte verschiedene, weitgehend voneinander unabhängig agierende Sprachversionen. Sie sind nicht nur unterschiedlich groß, sondern bestehen auch aus differierenden Inhalten. Artikel zu ein und demselben Stichwort können von Wikipedia zu Wikipedia erheblich voneinander abweichen. Von der Gemeinschaft bereits erarbeitetes Wissen steht daher nicht allen Nutzern in der Welt gleichermaßen zur Verfügung. Mit einem forcierten interlingualen Wissensaustausch ließe es sich aber für eine gegenseitige Bereicherung der Wikipedias nutzen. Das Buch gibt zunächst einen allgemeinen Überblick zur Wikipedia, geht auf ihre Entstehung, ihre Funktionsweise und auf die beteiligten Akteure ein. Auch das "Erfolgsgeheimnis" des Nachschlagewerks sowie aktuelle Herausforderungen werden herausgearbeitet. Die anschließende Untersuchung zeigt, wie sehr verschieden große Wikipedias voneinander differieren und wo die Unterschiede im Einzelnen liegen. Danach folgt eine Vorstellung von Ansätzen, Werkzeugen und Schwierigkeiten des interlingualen Wissensaustauschs zwischen den Sprachversionen. Der letzte Teil entwirft schließlich ein detailliertes Konzept für einen neuartigen Wissensaustausch, das aus mehreren ineinandergreifenden Komponenten rund um den Kern einer speziellen Übersetzungsoberfläche besteht. Das Konzept lässt sich auch als Blaupause für Lokalisierungsbemühungen multisprachlicher Wikis nutzen, wie sie international operierende Unternehmungen zunehmend einsetzen. Die Ausarbeitung, auf der dieses Buch basiert, wurde mit dem FHP-Preis 2011 für die beste Abschlussarbeit im Studiengang "Information und Dokumentation" der FH Potsdam ausgezeichnet.

BK

54.08 (Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft)
05.20 (Kommunikation und Gesellschaft)

Classification

54.08 (Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft)
05.20 (Kommunikation und Gesellschaft)

7.483623E-4 = product of:
  0.012722159 = sum of:
    0.012722159 = weight(_text_:und in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012722159 = score(doc=4966,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052480873 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023678783 = queryNorm
        0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
  0.05882353 = coord(1/17)

RSWK

Bibliothekswissenschaft / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Einführung

Subject

Bibliothekswissenschaft / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Einführung