-
Kleinwächter, W.: Macht und Geld im Cyberspace : wie der Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft (WSIS) die Weichen für die Zukunft stellt (2004)
0.01
0.010599367 = product of:
0.021198735 = sum of:
0.021198735 = product of:
0.04239747 = sum of:
0.04239747 = weight(_text_:22 in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04239747 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1549726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.12.2006 18:22:32
- Isbn
- 3-936931-22-4
-
Sunstein, C.: Infotopia : wie viele Köpfe Wissen produzieren (2009)
0.01
0.005357827 = product of:
0.010715654 = sum of:
0.010715654 = product of:
0.021431308 = sum of:
0.021431308 = weight(_text_:r in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021431308 = score(doc=5219,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14649466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die Produktion und Verbreitung von Informationen und Wissen ist heute nicht mehr nur die Sache weniger hochspezialisierter Experten und exklusiver Kreise, sondern vielmehr ein kollektives Unternehmen. Viele Köpfe auf der ganzen Welt - Sachverständige wie Laien - arbeiten von heimischen Rechnern aus über Wikis, Blogs und Open-Source-Projekte gemeinsam am Wissenskorpus der Menschheit, der dann über das Internet fast jedermann zur Verfügung steht. Fluch oder Segen? Werden wir durch die Überflutung mit ungesicherten Informationen zu Schafen einer digitalen Herde, die einfach das glauben, was viele für richtig halten, und nicht, was wirklich richtig ist? Oder verwirklicht sich hier gerade eine Utopie: alles zu wissen, was jeder von uns weiß? Cass R. Sunstein exponiert sich in seinem neuen Buch als entschiedener Infotopist. Traditionelle geschlossene Expertenzirkel, so zeigt er, werden häufig zu »Informationskokons«, aus denen heraus nicht selten Entscheidungen mit fatalen Folgen getroffen werden - etwa jene, die zur Rechtfertigung des Irak-Krieges, zum Zusammenbruch von Enron und zum Absturz des Space Shuttle Columbia geführt haben. Die neuen Formen kollektiven Wissenserwerbs unterliegen hingegen einem Prozeß, in dem Informationen fortlaufend und öffentlich ausgetauscht, aktualisiert und kritisiert werden. Anhand zahlreicher schlagender Beispiele und mit theoretischer Prägnanz erarbeitet Sunstein Regeln für eine Kommunikation im offenen Wissensnetzwerk, mit denen sich diese Diskussionsprozesse so gestalten lassen, daß wir zu mehr und vor allem exakterem Wissen kommen, an dem wir im infotopischen Idealfall alle partizipieren können.
-
Gleick, J.: ¬Die Information : Geschichte, Theorie, Flut (2011)
0.01
0.005357827 = product of:
0.010715654 = sum of:
0.010715654 = product of:
0.021431308 = sum of:
0.021431308 = weight(_text_:r in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021431308 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14649466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2012, H.6, S.94-96 (R. Pilous): " ... Bei aller Materialfülle nimmt Gleick einen technokratischen Standpunkt ein - so konsequent, dass er Gedanken zum Verstehen von Information durch den Menschen oder zur Philosophie selbst dort weglässt, wo sie sich aufdrängen. Seiner leidenschaftlich vorgebrachten Vision, die moderne Physik auf eine Art Quanteninformationstheorie zu reduzieren, fehlt eine gründliche Reflexion ebenso wie seiner Darstellung der Theorie der Meme. Und dennoch: Gleicks Projekt einer Gesamtdarstellung des Informationsbegriffs ist mutig, bisher einmalig und im Wesentlichen gelungen."
-
Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008)
0.01
0.005357827 = product of:
0.010715654 = sum of:
0.010715654 = product of:
0.021431308 = sum of:
0.021431308 = weight(_text_:r in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021431308 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14649466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Grimm, P. u. R. Capurro
-
Gleick, J.: ¬The information : a history, a theory, a flood (2011)
0.01
0.0053212917 = product of:
0.0106425835 = sum of:
0.0106425835 = product of:
0.0638555 = sum of:
0.0638555 = weight(_text_:after in 4979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0638555 = score(doc=4979,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22617343 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.2823298 = fieldWeight in 4979, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4979)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Drums that talk -- Persistence of the word -- Two wordbooks -- To throw the powers of thought into wheel-work -- A nervous system for the Earth -- New wires, new logic -- Information theory -- The informational turn -- Entropy and its demons -- Life's own code -- Into the meme pool -- The sense of randomness -- Information is physical -- After the flood -- New news every day.
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik : Umgang mit Wissen und Information in elektronischen Räumen (2004)
0.00
0.0040183705 = product of:
0.008036741 = sum of:
0.008036741 = product of:
0.016073482 = sum of:
0.016073482 = weight(_text_:r in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016073482 = score(doc=18,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14649466 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Levy, S.: In the plex : how Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives (2011)
0.00
0.0037249045 = product of:
0.007449809 = sum of:
0.007449809 = product of:
0.044698853 = sum of:
0.044698853 = weight(_text_:after in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044698853 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22617343 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.19763087 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Few companies in history have ever been as successful and as admired as Google, the company that has transformed the Internet and become an indispensable part of our lives. How has Google done it? Veteran technology reporter Steven Levy was granted unprecedented access to the company, and in this revelatory book he takes readers inside Google headquarters-the Googleplex-to show how Google works. While they were still students at Stanford, Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin revolutionized Internet search. They followed this brilliant innovation with another, as two of Google's earliest employees found a way to do what no one else had: make billions of dollars from Internet advertising. With this cash cow (until Google's IPO nobody other than Google management had any idea how lucrative the company's ad business was), Google was able to expand dramatically and take on other transformative projects: more efficient data centers, open-source cell phones, free Internet video (YouTube), cloud computing, digitizing books, and much more. The key to Google's success in all these businesses, Levy reveals, is its engineering mind-set and adoption of such Internet values as speed, openness, experimentation, and risk taking. After its unapologetically elitist approach to hiring, Google pampers its engineers-free food and dry cleaning, on-site doctors and masseuses-and gives them all the resources they need to succeed. Even today, with a workforce of more than 23,000, Larry Page signs off on every hire. But has Google lost its innovative edge? It stumbled badly in China-Levy discloses what went wrong and how Brin disagreed with his peers on the China strategy-and now with its newest initiative, social networking, Google is chasing a successful competitor for the first time. Some employees are leaving the company for smaller, nimbler start-ups. Can the company that famously decided not to be evil still compete? No other book has ever turned Google inside out as Levy does with In the Plex.
-
Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; Stansbury, M.: Virtual inequality : beyond the digital divide (2003)
0.00
0.0021285168 = product of:
0.0042570336 = sum of:
0.0042570336 = product of:
0.0255422 = sum of:
0.0255422 = weight(_text_:after in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0255422 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22617343 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.04425475 = queryNorm
0.11293192 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1107154 = idf(docFreq=724, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Anmerkung des Rezensenten in JASIST 55(2004) no.11, S.1024: "After reflecting an a requestfrom the authors of the reviewed book, 1 find that I did indeed err in my criticism of their methodology. The work's fault lies not with the methodology but rather with the discussion and explanation provided for the methodology. The authors do offer brief methodological explanation and justification in endnotes and appendices but are less clear in the book's text. I apologize to both the readers of the review and the authors for misinterpreting the text. For the authors' part, a methodology chapter would have been welcome. I am pleased to put right this misinterpretation that cast a shadow over an otherwise fine work."
