Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"06.35 Informationsmanagement"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.02 
    0.022297796 = product of:
  0.04459559 = sum of:
    0.027942104 = weight(_text_:services in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027942104 = score(doc=5134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046906993 = queryNorm
        0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
    0.016653487 = product of:
      0.033306975 = sum of:
        0.033306975 = weight(_text_:management in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033306975 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.21066327 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Metadata research has emerged as a discipline cross-cutting many domains, focused on the provision of distributed descriptions (often called annotations) to Web resources or applications. Such associated descriptions are supposed to serve as a foundation for advanced services in many application areas, including search and location, personalization, federation of repositories and automated delivery of information. Indeed, the Semantic Web is in itself a concrete technological framework for ontology-based metadata. For example, Web-based social networking requires metadata describing people and their interrelations, and large databases with biological information use complex and detailed metadata schemas for more precise and informed search strategies. There is a wide diversity in the languages and idioms used for providing meta-descriptions, from simple structured text in metadata schemas to formal annotations using ontologies, and the technologies for storing, sharing and exploiting meta-descriptions are also diverse and evolve rapidly. In addition, there is a proliferation of schemas and standards related to metadata, resulting in a complex and moving technological landscape - hence, the need for specialized knowledge and skills in this area. The Handbook of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies is intended as an authoritative reference for students, practitioners and researchers, serving as a roadmap for the variety of metadata schemas and ontologies available in a number of key domain areas, including culture, biology, education, healthcare, engineering and library science.
    LCSH
    Database management
    Subject
    Database management
  2. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01 
    0.0063552503 = product of:
  0.025421001 = sum of:
    0.025421001 = product of:
      0.050842002 = sum of:
        0.050842002 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050842002 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  3. Blair, A: Too much to know : managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011) 0.01 
    0.005099069 = product of:
  0.020396275 = sum of:
    0.020396275 = product of:
      0.04079255 = sum of:
        0.04079255 = weight(_text_:management in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04079255 = score(doc=4474,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046906993 = queryNorm
            0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of "information overload," yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann M. Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register complaints very similar to our own. Blair examines methods of information management in ancient and medieval Europe as well as the Islamic world and China, then focuses particular attention on the organization, composition, and reception of Latin reference books in print in early modern Europe. She explores in detail the sophisticated and sometimes idiosyncratic techniques that scholars and readers developed in an era of new technology and exploding information.
    Content
    Information management in comparative perspective -- Note-taking as information management -- Reference genres and their finding devices -- Compilers, their motivations and methods -- The impact of early printed reference books.

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications