Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.006343398 = product of:
  0.038060386 = sum of:
    0.038060386 = sum of:
      0.012345885 = weight(_text_:web in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012345885 = score(doc=46,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.121056244 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037093874 = queryNorm
          0.1019847 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
      0.0257145 = weight(_text_:seite in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0257145 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20776512 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037093874 = queryNorm
          0.12376717 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Footnote

Konkurrenz belebt das Geschäft, so auch im vorliegenden Fall. Was freilich verhindert werden muss, ist zunächst, auf bibliothekarischer Seite hochnäsig und beleidigt zu reagieren, denn was Google allein bisher konzipiert und realisiert hat, ist in seiner Grundidee viel zu wertvoll, als dass man es pauschal in Misskredit bringen dürfte. Eine deutsche bzw. gesamteuropäische Initiative dürfte bei der Massendigitalisierung von Altbestand nicht blind >irgendwelche< Magazinbestände bündeln, sondern intellektuellen Aufwand betreiben, um langfristig belastbare und plausible Kriterien zu entwickeln, was digitalisiert werden soll und was vorerst nicht. Erst wer die Relevanz des jeweiligen Buches für die Forschung, die Seltenheit des Werkes, seine Nachfrage innerhalb der Forscherszene, seine allgemeine kulturelle Bedeutung sowie den konservatorischen Zustand der heute erhaltenen Exemplare in Betracht zieht, schafft einen qualitativen Mehrwert gegenüber Google. ... Google macht neugierig - und das allein ist wünschenswert und erfreulich. Zugleich fordert uns Google massiv heraus: sicherlich für manche unerwünscht und lästig, objektiv betrachtet aber die vielleicht einzige Möglichkeit, die Verzögerung Europas in Digitalisierungsfragen zu stoppen. Dem Verlag Wagenbach sei gedankt, die Kontroverse um Google durch eine Übersetzung der streitbaren Thesen Jeanneneys auch in Deutschland entfacht zu haben."

LCSH

Web search engines

Subject

Web search engines

0.0048256116 = product of:
  0.028953668 = sum of:
    0.028953668 = product of:
      0.057907335 = sum of:
        0.057907335 = weight(_text_:web in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057907335 = score(doc=3371,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.121056244 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037093874 = queryNorm
            0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.

Content

Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel

LCSH

Semantic Web

RSWK

Elektronische Bibliothek / Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Elektronische Bibliothek / Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung
Semantic Web