Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"AZE (DU)"
  1. Meadow, C.T.: Text information retrieval systems (1992) 0.02 
    0.019264907 = product of:
  0.038529813 = sum of:
    0.038529813 = product of:
      0.05779472 = sum of:
        0.05189858 = weight(_text_:k in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05189858 = score(doc=1519,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
        0.005896138 = weight(_text_:s in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005896138 = score(doc=1519,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    BCA (FH K)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library quarterly 63(1993) no.1, S.106-108 (H.D. White); Journal of academic librarianship 19(1993) no.2, S.120 (H.D. White)
    GHBS
    BCA (FH K)
    Pages
    XIX,302 S
  2. Langridge, D.W.: Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Methoden (1994) 0.02 
    0.01843424 = product of:
  0.03686848 = sum of:
    0.03686848 = product of:
      0.055302717 = sum of:
        0.05189858 = weight(_text_:k in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05189858 = score(doc=3923,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034041367 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    BCAF (FH K)
    GHBS
    BCAF (FH K)
    Pages
    159 S
  3. Glöckner-Rist, A.: Suchfragen im Information Retrieval : eine empirische Untersuchung zum Rechercheverhalten von Informationsvermittlern und Endbenutzern (1992) 0.01 
    0.014747391 = product of:
  0.029494783 = sum of:
    0.029494783 = product of:
      0.044242173 = sum of:
        0.041518863 = weight(_text_:k in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041518863 = score(doc=1602,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18609051 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
        0.0027233092 = weight(_text_:s in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027233092 = score(doc=1602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    BCAQ (FH K)
    GHBS
    BCAQ (FH K)
    Pages
    292 S
  4. Poetzsch, E.: Information Retrieval : Einführung in Grundlagen und Methoden (2001) 0.00 
    9.628353E-4 = product of:
  0.0019256705 = sum of:
    0.0019256705 = product of:
      0.0057770116 = sum of:
        0.0057770116 = weight(_text_:s in 1655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057770116 = score(doc=1655,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1655, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1655)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: BuB 54(2002) H.2, S.119 (B. Denner)
    Pages
    238 S
  5. Social information retrieval systems : emerging technologies and applications for searching the Web effectively (2008) 0.00 
    9.077698E-4 = product of:
  0.0018155396 = sum of:
    0.0018155396 = product of:
      0.0054466184 = sum of:
        0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054466184 = score(doc=4127,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Goh, D. u. S. Foo
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 61(2010) no.12, S.2587-2588 (Gobinda Chowdhury)
    Pages
    XVIII, 375 S
    Type
    s
  6. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.00 
    4.9134484E-4 = product of:
  9.826897E-4 = sum of:
    9.826897E-4 = product of:
      0.002948069 = sum of:
        0.002948069 = weight(_text_:s in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002948069 = score(doc=3054,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052129436 = queryNorm
            0.052015185 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Enthält die Beiträge der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen. Volltext unter: http://www.waxmann.com/kat/inhalt/2039Volltext.pdf. Vgl. die Rez. unter: http://sehepunkte.de/2008/11/14934.html. Rez. in: IWP 60(1009) H.4, S.246-247 (C. Wolff): "Tagging-Systeme erfreuen sich in den letzten Jahren einer ungemein großen Beliebtheit, erlauben sie dem Nutzer doch die Informationserschließung "mit eigenen Worten", also ohne Rekurs auf vorgegebene Ordnungs- und Begriffsysteme und für Medien wie Bild und Video, für die herkömmliche Verfahren des Information Retrieval (noch) versagen. Die Beherrschung der Film- und Bilderfülle, wie wir sie bei Flickr oder YouTube vorfinden, ist mit anderen Mitteln als dem intellektuellen Einsatz der Nutzer nicht vorstellbar - eine professionelle Aufbereitung angesichts der Massendaten (und ihrer zu einem großen Teil auch minderen Qualität) nicht möglich und sinnvoll. Insofern hat sich Tagging als ein probates Mittel der Erschließung herausgebildet, das dort Lücken füllen kann, wo andere Verfahren (Erschließung durch information professionals, automatische Indexierung, Erschließung durch Autoren) fehlen oder nicht anwendbar sind. Unter dem Titel "Good Tags - Bad Tags. Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" und der Herausgeberschaft von Birgit Gaiser, Thorsten Hampel und Stefanie Panke sind in der Reihe Medien in der Wissenschaft (Bd. 47) Beiträge eines interdisziplinären Workshops der Gesellschaft für Medien in der Wissenschaft zum Thema Tagging versammelt, der im Frühjahr 2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien in Tübingen stattgefunden hat. . . .
    Pages
    234 S
    Type
    s

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications