Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"ST 271"
  1. Adam, M.; Musiat, J.; Stöhr, M.; Wenzel, C.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Überblick (2016) 0.02 
    0.015387174 = product of:
  0.117968336 = sum of:
    0.07054238 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07054238 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13988374 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024517681 = queryNorm
        0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
    0.030109445 = weight(_text_:und in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030109445 = score(doc=3298,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.05434018 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024517681 = queryNorm
        0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
    0.01731651 = weight(_text_:im in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01731651 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06930625 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024517681 = queryNorm
        0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
  0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    Abstract
    Das Dokument enthält einen Vergleich von sechs Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 11/2016 getestet. Folgende Kriterien wurden berücksichtigt: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportmöglichkeiten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Kooperation, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, weitere Funktionen und Benutzung. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.
  2. Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001) 0.00 
    3.6106602E-4 = product of:
  0.008304519 = sum of:
    0.008304519 = product of:
      0.016609037 = sum of:
        0.016609037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016609037 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08585674 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024517681 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:26:32

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications