-
¬The discipline of organizing (2013)
0.00
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = product of:
0.004812876 = sum of:
0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004812876 = score(doc=2172,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 66(2015) no.2, S.432-433 (M.J. Bates): Kritisch, viele Vorbehalte, vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23298/abstract; JASIST 66(2015) no.9, S,1963-1964 (E. Svenonius), vgl.: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23341/abstract.
- Pages
- XX, 539 S
- Type
- s
-
Heuer, S.; Tranberg, P.: Mich kriegt ihr nicht : die wichtigsten Schritte zur digitalen Selbstverteidigung (2019)
0.00
0.0010420184 = product of:
0.0020840368 = sum of:
0.0020840368 = product of:
0.0041680736 = sum of:
0.0041680736 = weight(_text_:s in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041680736 = score(doc=5667,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Wer sich online bewegt, ist nie allein. Im doppelten Sinne. Denn wenn wir das Leben um uns herum im Netz verfolgen wollen, nehmen wir in Kauf, dass uns Google, Amazon, Facebook & Co. auf Schritt und Klick verfolgen. Tausende Firmen profitieren davon, auf Basis unserer Likes und Klicks, sowie unseres Kaufverhaltens Werbung und Inhalte personalisiert auszuspielen und uns damit zu manipulieren. Mit jedem neuen Datensatz werden die Produkte noch enger an unsere Vorlieben angepasst, sodass wir sie noch häufiger nutzen ein Teufelskreis. Aber können wir uns dagegen wirklich verteidigen? Ja, sagt Digital-Experte Steffan Heuer auch heute noch. Sein Buch `Mich kriegt ihr nicht!´ ist eine Gebrauchsanweisung und gleichzeitig eine Waffe, mit der wir unsere Online-Identität mit einer neuen Daten-Ethik schützen können selbst in Zeiten von Smart Speakern wie Alexa und dem Internet der Dinge. Der Kampf um unsere Daten ist ein Kampf um unsere Souveränität, um unsere Freiheit! Und als solcher ist er noch lange nicht verloren wir müssen den Datendieben nur mit der richtigen digitalen Selbstverteidigung entgegentreten, nämlich mit den vier V´s: Wir müssen unsere Daten verweigern, verschleiern, verschlüsseln und Räume schaffen, aus denen alle Smart-Geräte verbannt sind. Wie das funktioniert, zeigt und erklärt der komplett überarbeitete Bestseller `Mich kriegt ihr nicht!´.
- Pages
- 279 S
-
Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; Stansbury, M.: Virtual inequality : beyond the digital divide (2003)
0.00
5.210092E-4 = product of:
0.0010420184 = sum of:
0.0010420184 = product of:
0.0020840368 = sum of:
0.0020840368 = weight(_text_:s in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020840368 = score(doc=1795,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.04161215 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 55(2004) no.5, S.467-468 (W. Koehler): "Virtual Inequality is an important contribution to the digital divide debate. That debate takes two basic forms. One centers an the divide between the "information rich" developed countries and the "information poor" developing countries. The second is concerned with the rift between information "haves" and "have-nots" within countries. This book addresses the latter domain and is concerned with the digital divide in the United States. This book is the product of a cross-disciplinary collaboration. Mossberger and Tolbert are both members of the Kent State University political science department while Stansbury is an the Library and Information Science faculty. The book is extremely well documented. Perhaps the chapter an the democracy divide and e-government is the best done, reflecting the political science bent of two of the authors. E-government is very well covered. Unfortunately, e-commerce and e-education go virtually unmentioned. If e-government is important to defining the digital divide, then certainly e-commerce and e-education are as well. Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury argue that the digital divide should be described as four different divides: the access divide, the skills divide, the economic opportunity divide, and the democratic divide. Each of these divides is developed in its own chapter. Each chapter draws well an the existing literature. The book is valuable if for no other reason than that it provides an excellent critique of the current state of the understanding of the digital divide in the United States. It is particularly good in its contrast of the approaches taken by the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Perhaps this is a function of the multidisciplinary strength of the book's authorship, for indeed it shows here. The access divide is defined along "connectivity" lines: who has access to digital technologies. The authors tonfirm the conventional wisdom that age and education are important predictors of in-home access, but they also argue that rate and ethnicity are also factors (pp. 32-33): Asian Americans have greatest access followed by whites, Latinos, and African Americans in that order. Most access the Internet from home or work, followed by friends' computers, libraries, and other access points. The skills divide is defined as technical competence and information literacy (p. 38). Variation was found along technical competence for age, education, affluence, rate, and ethnicity, but not gender (p. 47). The authors conclude that for the most part the skills divide mirrors the access divide (p. 55). While they found no gender difference, they did find a gender preference for skills acquisition: males prefer a more impersonal delivery ("online help and tutorials") while females prefer more personal instruction (p. 56).
Anmerkung des Rezensenten in JASIST 55(2004) no.11, S.1024: "After reflecting an a requestfrom the authors of the reviewed book, 1 find that I did indeed err in my criticism of their methodology. The work's fault lies not with the methodology but rather with the discussion and explanation provided for the methodology. The authors do offer brief methodological explanation and justification in endnotes and appendices but are less clear in the book's text. I apologize to both the readers of the review and the authors for misinterpreting the text. For the authors' part, a methodology chapter would have been welcome. I am pleased to put right this misinterpretation that cast a shadow over an otherwise fine work."
- Pages
- xvi, 192 S
