Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.010970165 = product of:
  0.04388066 = sum of:
    0.04388066 = weight(_text_:methode in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04388066 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25275874 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.285241 = idf(docFreq=223, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040214643 = queryNorm
        0.17360689 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.285241 = idf(docFreq=223, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

- Theoretische Ansätze und empirische Untersuchungen Stefanie Panke & Birgit Gaiser: "With my head up in the clouds" - Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht Christoph Held& Ulrike Cress: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht Michael Derntl, Thorsten Hampel, Renate Motschnig & Tomas Pitner: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access - Einsatz von Tagging in Hochschulen und Bibliotheken Christian Hänger: Good tags or bad tags? Tagging im Kontext der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung Mandy Schiefner: Social Tagging in der universitären Lehre Michael Blank, Thomas Bopp, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Social Tagging = Soziale Suche? Andreas Harrer & Steffen Lohmann: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse Harald Sack & Jörg Waitelonis: Zeitbezogene kollaborative Annotation zur Verbesserung der inhaltsbasierten Videosuche - Kommerzielle Anwendungen von Tagging Karl Tschetschonig, Roland Ladengruber, Thorsten Hampel & Jonas Schulte: Kollaborative Tagging-Systeme im Electronic Commerce Tilman Küchler, Jan M. Pawlowski & Volker Zimmermann: Social Tagging and Open Content: A Concept for the Future of E-Learning and Knowledge Management? Stephan Schillenvein: Der .Business Case' für die Nutzung von Social Tagging in Intranets und internen Informationssystemen

0.0027489932 = product of:
  0.010995973 = sum of:
    0.010995973 = product of:
      0.03298792 = sum of:
        0.03298792 = weight(_text_:29 in 4332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03298792 = score(doc=4332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14146253 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040214643 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4332)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

12. 2.2011 17:29:27

0.0018161763 = product of:
  0.0072647054 = sum of:
    0.0072647054 = product of:
      0.021794116 = sum of:
        0.021794116 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021794116 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14082482 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040214643 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Internet Professionell. 2000, H.2, S.22