Search (284 results, page 15 of 15)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.00
    4.8590987E-4 = product of:
      0.011175927 = sum of:
        0.011175927 = product of:
          0.022351854 = sum of:
            0.022351854 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022351854 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  2. Laufer, G.; Schäfer, U.; Müller, M.: RAK-NBM und RAK-Musik (1997) 0.00
    4.4490883E-4 = product of:
      0.010232903 = sum of:
        0.010232903 = weight(_text_:und in 95) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010232903 = score(doc=95,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 95, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=95)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
  3. RAK-Musik oder AACR2 - Internationalisierung von Katalogdaten : Stellungnahme der deutschen Gruppe der Association Internationale des Bibliothèques, Archives et Centres de Documentation Musicaux (AIBM / IAML / IVMB) (2003) 0.00
    4.0990516E-4 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 37(2003) H.1, S.53-55
  4. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.00
    2.5196982E-4 = product of:
      0.0057953056 = sum of:
        0.0057953056 = product of:
          0.011590611 = sum of:
            0.011590611 = weight(_text_:international in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011590611 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.14742646 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)

Authors