Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Pohl, A.: Mit der DFG und CIB nach WorldShare und Alma (2013) 0.01
    0.00601455 = product of:
      0.0721746 = sum of:
        0.0721746 = weight(_text_:systeme in 1829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0721746 = score(doc=1829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17439179 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.41386467 = fieldWeight in 1829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1829)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    Die DFG hat am 15. März den Ausgang der wichtigen DFG-Ausschreibung "Neuausrichtung überregionaler Informationsservices" verkündet. Ich denke, das Thema verlangt ein bisschen mehr Aufmerksamkeit in der Fachwelt als ihm bisher zugekommen ist, weil es sich eben nicht um eine der üblichen DFG-Ausschreibungen handelt, sondern um den erklärten Versuch, "einen umfassenden Umstrukturierungsprozess mit anzustoßen und zu unterstützen", der eine grundlegende Veränderung der Informationsinfrastruktur in Deutschland mit sich bringen kann. Im Themenfeld 1 "Bibliotheksdateninfrastruktur und Lokale Systeme" wurde der Antrag "Cloudbasierte Infrastruktur für Bibliotheksdaten (CIB)" bewilligt, mit dem ich mich hier näher befassen möchte.
  2. Schürmann, H.: Sacherschliessung nach RDA (2015) 0.00
    0.0020709615 = product of:
      0.024851536 = sum of:
        0.024851536 = product of:
          0.049703073 = sum of:
            0.049703073 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049703073 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  3. Vorndran, A.: Hervorholen, was in unseren Daten steckt! : Mehrwerte durch Analysen großer Bibliotheksdatenbestände (2018) 0.00
    0.0020709615 = product of:
      0.024851536 = sum of:
        0.024851536 = product of:
          0.049703073 = sum of:
            0.049703073 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 4601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049703073 = score(doc=4601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17123379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032588977 = queryNorm
                0.2902644 = fieldWeight in 4601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  4. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.00
    0.0010460628 = product of:
      0.012552753 = sum of:
        0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012552753 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032588977 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Abstract
    The point of this paper is not to critique RDA (a futile task, since RDA is here to stay), but to make plain that its claim to be a solution to the challenge(s) of bibliographic description in the Internet Age is unfounded, and, secondarily, to explain why such wild claims continue to be advanced and go unchallenged by the rank and file of career catalogers.