Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Boeuf, P. le: ¬Die Auswirkungen des FRBR Modells auf die zukünftigen Revisionen des ISBD : eine Herausforderung für die Sektion Katalogisierung der IFLA (2001) 0.02
    0.01949679 = product of:
      0.03899358 = sum of:
        0.03899358 = product of:
          0.07798716 = sum of:
            0.07798716 = weight(_text_:p in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07798716 = score(doc=6903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Boeuf, P. le: "Zwischen Traum und Wirklichkeit" : die FRBR-Theorisierung und einige FRBR-Anwendungen (2004) 0.01
    0.01299786 = product of:
      0.02599572 = sum of:
        0.02599572 = product of:
          0.05199144 = sum of:
            0.05199144 = weight(_text_:p in 2486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05199144 = score(doc=2486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Fuchs, C.; Pampel, H.; Vierkant, P.: ORCID in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme im Jahr 2016 (2017) 0.01
    0.009748395 = product of:
      0.01949679 = sum of:
        0.01949679 = product of:
          0.03899358 = sum of:
            0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03899358 = score(doc=3857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Vierkant, P.: Entwurf des DataCite-Metadatenschemas 4.5 offen für Kommentierung (2022) 0.01
    0.009748395 = product of:
      0.01949679 = sum of:
        0.01949679 = product of:
          0.03899358 = sum of:
            0.03899358 = weight(_text_:p in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03899358 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.01
    0.00649893 = product of:
      0.01299786 = sum of:
        0.01299786 = product of:
          0.02599572 = sum of:
            0.02599572 = weight(_text_:p in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02599572 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16359726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045500398 = queryNorm
                0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)