-
Lauf-Immesberger, K.: Tagung in Gütersloh : EDV Programme für Bibliotheken (1988)
0.04
0.03896336 = product of:
0.11689007 = sum of:
0.05872617 = weight(_text_:applications in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05872617 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17247584 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.34048924 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4025097 = idf(docFreq=1471, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
0.010478153 = weight(_text_:of in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010478153 = score(doc=5688,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047685754 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.02
0.015557649 = product of:
0.046672944 = sum of:
0.012963352 = weight(_text_:of in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012963352 = score(doc=2422,freq=12.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.020439833 = weight(_text_:systems in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020439833 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.1697705 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.013269759 = product of:
0.026539518 = sum of:
0.026539518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026539518 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
- Abstract
- Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Henze, G.: Weiterentwicklung der RAK (2001)
0.01
0.009899746 = product of:
0.044548854 = sum of:
0.012701439 = weight(_text_:of in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012701439 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
0.031847417 = product of:
0.063694835 = sum of:
0.063694835 = weight(_text_:22 in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063694835 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Date
- 22. 8.2001 15:46:46
- Footnote
- Mit Abb. "AACR type of publication model"
-
Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016)
0.01
0.009689082 = product of:
0.04360087 = sum of:
0.016351866 = weight(_text_:systems in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016351866 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
0.027249003 = weight(_text_:software in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027249003 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
-
Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : Microrechnergestützte Datenbanksysteme für die Verarbeitung bibliothekarischer Daten: Allegro-C, LIDOS, TINman im Vergleich (1989)
0.01
0.009083001 = product of:
0.08174701 = sum of:
0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08174701 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.525975 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : datenbankgestützte Systeme für die Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten: allegro-C, BIS-LOK, IBAS IV/Biblio (1992)
0.01
0.009083001 = product of:
0.08174701 = sum of:
0.08174701 = weight(_text_:software in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08174701 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.525975 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.01
0.008925734 = product of:
0.040165804 = sum of:
0.018934188 = weight(_text_:of in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018934188 = score(doc=2502,freq=10.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.021231614 = product of:
0.042463228 = sum of:
0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042463228 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.01
0.008481526 = product of:
0.038166866 = sum of:
0.016935252 = weight(_text_:of in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016935252 = score(doc=4431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.021231614 = product of:
0.042463228 = sum of:
0.042463228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042463228 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006)
0.01
0.0074213347 = product of:
0.033396006 = sum of:
0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014818345 = score(doc=2425,freq=8.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.018577661 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037155323 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017)
0.01
0.0068929386 = product of:
0.031018224 = sum of:
0.014666359 = weight(_text_:of in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014666359 = score(doc=3818,freq=24.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
0.016351866 = weight(_text_:systems in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016351866 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.1358164 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- A brochure on RDA issued in 2010 includes the statements that "RDA goes beyond earlier cataloguing codes in that it provides guidelines on cataloguing digital resources and a stronger emphasis on helping users find, identify, select, and obtain the information they want. RDA also supports clustering of bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators. This important new feature makes users more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats - an exciting development." Setting aside the fact that the author(s) of these statements and I differ on the definition of exciting, their claims are, at best, dubious. There is no evidence-empirical or anecdotal-that bibliographic records created using RDA are any better than records created using AACR2 (or AACR, for that matter) in "helping users find, identify, select, and obtain the information they want." The claim is especially unfounded in the context of the current discovery ecosystem, in which users are perfectly capable of finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining information with absolutely no assistance from libraries or the bibliographic data libraries create.
Equally fallacious is the statement that support for the "clustering bibliographic records to show relationships between works and their creators" is an "important new feature" of RDA. AACR2 bibliographic records and the systems housing them can, did, and do show such relationships. Finally, whether users want or care to be made "more aware of a work's different editions, translations, or physical formats" is debatable. As an aim, it sounds less like what a user wants and more like what a cataloging librarian thinks a user should want. As Amanda Cossham writes in her recently issued doctoral thesis: "The explicit focus on user needs in the FRBR model, the International Cataloguing Principles, and RDA: Resource Description and Access does not align well with the ways that users use, understand, and experience library catalogues nor with the ways that they understand and experience the wider information environment. User tasks, as constituted in the FRBR model and RDA, are insufficient to meet users' needs." (p. 11, emphasis in the original)
The point of this paper is not to critique RDA (a futile task, since RDA is here to stay), but to make plain that its claim to be a solution to the challenge(s) of bibliographic description in the Internet Age is unfounded, and, secondarily, to explain why such wild claims continue to be advanced and go unchallenged by the rank and file of career catalogers.
-
Poser, M.: Analyse und Bewertung ausgewählter Funktionen von ALEPH-Katalogen in Bezug auf Anforderungen und Erwartungen aus Benutzersicht (2008)
0.01
0.0067684916 = product of:
0.030458212 = sum of:
0.0073331795 = weight(_text_:of in 3269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073331795 = score(doc=3269,freq=6.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.11970024 = fieldWeight in 3269, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3269)
0.023125032 = weight(_text_:systems in 3269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023125032 = score(doc=3269,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.19207339 = fieldWeight in 3269, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3269)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Aus Benutzersicht verkörpern Online-Kataloge "the most visible form of library automation." Entweder über das lokale Netzwerk innerhalb der Bibliothek oder eingebunden in das Web-Portal von außerhalb zugänglich, bildet der Online-Katalog den zentralen Ausgangspunkt für die Recherche in Bibliotheksbeständen. Er ist zugleich Kernbestandteil eines integrierten Bibliothekssystems, dessen Entwicklung "has been one of movement from centralized systems, designed and controlled by system designers and programmers, to more and more distributed and customizable systems." Letztgenannte Eigenschaft kennzeichnet auch das Bibliothekssystem ALEPH 500, das vor zehn Jahren mit der Einführung durch die Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek in Bregenz/ Österreich seinen Einzug in den deutschsprachigen Raum startete. Bereits ein Jahr später wurde die Anwendung von den vier Berliner Universitätsbibliotheken in Betrieb genommen und ist seit 2002 auch in der Senatsbibliothek Berlin im Einsatz. Der wiederholte Kontakt mit dem ALEPH-System - sei es im Rahmen von Literaturrecherche, Praktikum oder universitärem Veranstaltungsangebot - gab Anlass für eine nähere Beschäftigung mit diesem Thema. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Auseinandersetzung mit der Funktionalität von ALEPH-Katalogen und das Herausstellen ihrer Unterschiede im Umfang und in der Ausgestaltung des Angebots hinsichtlich der Ausrichtung auf die Bedürfnisse der Benutzer. Angesichts der gestiegenen Erwartungshaltung in Bezug auf eine schnelle und zuverlässige Informationsbeschaffung soll der Frage nachgegangen werden, in welchem Ausmaß die verfügbaren Möglichkeiten des Softwaresystems ausgeschöpft bzw. zusätzlich ergänzt werden. Die Untersuchung beschränkt sich ausschließlich auf deutschsprachige Kataloge, um aufgrund der ähnlichen Randbedingungen eine bessere Vergleichbarkeit zu gewährleisten. Auf Aspekte der Gestaltung und der Barrierefreiheit wird dabei nicht näher eingegangen, da diese wiederum selbst eigenständige Themengebiete darstellen. Auch der Bereich der Online-Hilfen ist von der Untersuchung ausgenommen, da diese bereits an anderer Stelle ausführlich behandelt wurden. Die Aufbereitung der Ergebnisse betrachtet die untersuchten Online-Kataloge überwiegend in ihrer Gesamtheit, einige beispielhafte Fälle werden zur Demonstration hervorgehoben. Die genauen Resultate sind im Einzelnen erfasst und können der Tabelle im Anhang entnommen werden.
- Content
- Bachelorarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Bachelor of Arts (B. A.) im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Philosophische Fakultät I. Vgl. unter: http://www.agi-imc.de/internet.nsf/26efb65f701b0871c125751a00413614/fc471b3b08c89850c125788e004b5270/$FILE/Myriam_Poser.pdf.
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.01
0.006672452 = product of:
0.06005207 = sum of:
0.06005207 = product of:
0.12010414 = sum of:
0.12010414 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12010414 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Nolte, A.: Zeit des Abschieds : Nach der Mark gehen nun auch RAK und MAB. Standardisierungsausschuss beschließt Umstieg auf MARC und AACR (2002)
0.01
0.006055334 = product of:
0.054498006 = sum of:
0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054498006 = score(doc=573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Content
- Kritischer Beitrag zu den Beschlüssen des Standardierungsausschusses und den möglichen Konsequenzen für die Öffentlichen Bibliotheken: "Der Aufwand wird gewaltig: Umstellung der Kataloge, Umstellung der Software, Umstellung der Datenbanken Umschulung des Personals - da werden die Öffentlichen Bibliotheken so manche Millionen freischaufeln dürfen - wie gesagt, für null Nutzen."
-
Klauß, H.: RDA: Folgen für die Katalogisierung und die OPAC-Gestaltung (2013)
0.01
0.006055334 = product of:
0.054498006 = sum of:
0.054498006 = weight(_text_:software in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054498006 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Das Regelwerk RDA wird einige Veränderungen für den Katalog von Bibliotheken erbringen, die für Benutzer hilfreich sind. Dieser Fortschritt wird auch für die Katalogisierer und die Gestaltung des OPACs Fortentwicklungen erzwingen. Hierfür muss die in Bibliotheken verwendete Software sowohl hinsichtlich Katalogisierung wie OPAC fortentwickelt werden, was anhand von Beispielen gezeigt wird.
-
Degkwitz, A.: Innovationspotenziale cloud-basierter Bibliothekssysteme (2016)
0.01
0.005298417 = product of:
0.047685754 = sum of:
0.047685754 = weight(_text_:software in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047685754 = score(doc=3032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15541996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Die Generation der neuen Bibliothekssysteme, die in "Clouds" gehostet und als "Software as a Service" (SaaS) betrieben werden, haben das Potenzial, die Verarbeitungsmöglichkeiten von "Big Data" in Bibliotheken Realität werden zu lassen. Auf diese Weise können bibliographische Metadaten mittels neuer und innovativer Verarbeitungsverfahren in großem Umfang aggregiert, angereichert und verlinkt werden, so dass herkömmliche Prozesse des Metadatenmanagements entweder weiterentwickelt oder durch neue Verfahren und Werkzeuge ersetzt werden. Aber die Potenziale der cloud-basierten Bibliothekssysteme haben die bibliothekarische Praxis noch nicht wirklich erreicht. Zugleich sind damit große Herausforderungen verbunden, die von den Bibliotheken unbedingt aufgegriffen und in neue Services zur Verbesserung der Recherchequalität ihrer Systeme umgesetzt werden müssen.
-
Henze, G.: First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (2003)
0.00
0.004612034 = product of:
0.020754153 = sum of:
0.0074843946 = weight(_text_:of in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074843946 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.12216854 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.013269759 = product of:
0.026539518 = sum of:
0.026539518 = weight(_text_:22 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026539518 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Vom 28. bis 30. Juli 2003 trafen sich in der Deutschen Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main auf Einladung der Sektion Katalogisierung der IFLA Regelwerksexperten aus Europa, Amerika und Australien zum »First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code«. Die europäischen Regelwerksgremien entsandten verantwortliche Regelwerksexperten. Dieser Auftaktveranstaltung, die die Erschließung in Europa zum Schwerpunkt hatte, sollen weitere Veranstaltungen im Vorfeld der IFLA-Konferenzen 2004 in Buenos Aires und 2006 in Seoul folgen. 52 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer aus insgesamt 29 Ländern und drei Kontinenten nutzten die Gelegenheit zu einem intensiven Informations- und Meinungsaustausch auf der Frankfurter Konferenz, nachdem bereits im Vorfeld Hintergrundpapiere auf der Konferenz-Website" bereitgestellt worden waren. Diskussionsbeiträge wurden ebenfalls bereits vor dem Treffen über eine E-MailListe ausgetauscht, die nicht nur den Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmern, sondern auch weiteren Interessierten offen stand und besonders in den Wochen und Tagen vor der Konferenz rege genutzt wurde. Arbeitssprache der Konferenz war englisch. Das Ziel der Konferenz, die Möglichkeiten eines weltweiten Datenaustausches über gemeinsame Standards zu den Inhalten von bibliografischen Datensätzen und Normdatensätzen zu verbessern, stieß auf allgemeines Interesse. Für eine vergleichende Untersuchung zu grundlegenden Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschieden in den derzeit in Europa verwendeten Regelwerken erstellten die Regelwerksgremien unter Verwendung eines einheitlichen Fragenkataloges »Steckbriefe«, um Möglichkeiten einer Harmonisierung auszuloten und vielleicht sogar in naher Zukunft ein internationales Regelwerk zu entwickeln. Angesichts der Vielzahl der in Europa verwendeten Regelwerke konnten diese nicht alle im Plenum vorgestellt werden. Stattdessen gab es eine kurze Vorstellung der Regelwerksgremien in den angloamerikanischen Ländern sowie Frankreich, Deutschland und Osterreich, Spanien, Russland, Italien und Kroatien.
- Date
- 16.11.2003 19:22:45
-
Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999)
0.00
0.0041702827 = product of:
0.037532546 = sum of:
0.037532546 = product of:
0.07506509 = sum of:
0.07506509 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07506509 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:40:40
-
RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995)
0.00
0.004128369 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = product of:
0.074310645 = sum of:
0.074310645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074310645 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Münnich, M.: RAK2: Sachstandsbericht : vom Bibliothekartag '95 zum Bibliothekartag '96 (1996)
0.00
0.004128369 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = product of:
0.074310645 = sum of:
0.074310645 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074310645 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 21. 9.1996 16:03:22
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.00
0.004128369 = product of:
0.037155323 = sum of:
0.037155323 = product of:
0.074310645 = sum of:
0.074310645 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074310645 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13719016 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03917671 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
