Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  1. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.00
    0.0042995503 = product of:
      0.012898651 = sum of:
        0.012898651 = product of:
          0.025797302 = sum of:
            0.025797302 = weight(_text_:of in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025797302 = score(doc=2152,freq=38.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.37654874 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
                  6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                    38.0 = termFreq=38.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  2. Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002) 0.00
    0.0029678966 = product of:
      0.00890369 = sum of:
        0.00890369 = product of:
          0.01780738 = sum of:
            0.01780738 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01780738 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 17:56:19