Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.033556182 = product of:
  0.067112364 = sum of:
    0.067112364 = sum of:
      0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0096767275 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052990302 = queryNorm
          0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.057435635 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057435635 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052990302 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Einer der lesenswertesten Beiträge in der Geschichte der Sacherschließung im deutschen Bibliothekswesen; enthält Situationsbeschreibung der SUB Hamburg im Jahr 1946 und Vorschläge für die Neugestaltung eines systematischen Erschließungssystems. - Vgl. auch spätere Beiträge von E. Zimmermann u. H. Vollmer

Source

Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946

0.028717818 = product of:
  0.057435635 = sum of:
    0.057435635 = product of:
      0.11487127 = sum of:
        0.11487127 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11487127 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63

0.0076047545 = product of:
  0.015209509 = sum of:
    0.015209509 = product of:
      0.060838036 = sum of:
        0.060838036 = weight(_text_:authors in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060838036 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!

0.005384591 = product of:
  0.010769182 = sum of:
    0.010769182 = product of:
      0.021538364 = sum of:
        0.021538364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021538364 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18556301 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19

0.0024191819 = product of:
  0.0048383637 = sum of:
    0.0048383637 = product of:
      0.0096767275 = sum of:
        0.0096767275 = weight(_text_:e in 3932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0096767275 = score(doc=3932,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052990302 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3932, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

All E 68 / Geisteswissenschaften
All E 69 Ordnungskategorien der Wissenschaften

SBB

All E 68 / Geisteswissenschaften
All E 69 Ordnungskategorien der Wissenschaften