Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.04465288 = product of:
  0.17861152 = sum of:
    0.17861152 = weight(_text_:faktoren in 1433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17861152 = score(doc=1433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33662313 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0490661 = queryNorm
        0.53059787 = fieldWeight in 1433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.8606052 = idf(docFreq=125, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1433)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Es wird der Wissensbegriff und das Ordnungswissen, wie es sich aus der aristotelisch-thomistischen Tradition herleitete mit den Auffassungen über Wissensformen, wie sie bei Hobbes, Locke und anderen Autoren der beginnenden Neuzeit bestehen, in Verbindung gebracht und am Beispiel der Klassifikationsversuche von Bacon, Descartes, Leibniz, Locke und Hobbes untersucht, in welchem Maße der Methodendualismus von Empirismus und Rationalismus in die Klassifikationsmomente eingeht, wieweit zugleich auch wissenschaftsgeschichtliche, wissenssoziologische, gesellschaftspolitische und wissenschaftsorganisatorische Faktoren auf die Klassifikation einwirken, welche verschiedenen Ansätze zu einer Wissensordnung unternommen wurden in einer Epoche, die nicht unwesentlich die weitere Wissenschaftsentwicklung bestimmt hat

0.016347025 = product of:
  0.0653881 = sum of:
    0.0653881 = product of:
      0.1961643 = sum of:
        0.1961643 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1961643 = score(doc=2152,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.35099888 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0490661 = queryNorm
            0.5588744 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!

0.013295558 = product of:
  0.053182233 = sum of:
    0.053182233 = product of:
      0.106364466 = sum of:
        0.106364466 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106364466 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17182112 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0490661 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63

0.006647779 = product of:
  0.026591117 = sum of:
    0.026591117 = product of:
      0.053182233 = sum of:
        0.053182233 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053182233 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17182112 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0490661 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946

0.002492917 = product of:
  0.009971668 = sum of:
    0.009971668 = product of:
      0.019943336 = sum of:
        0.019943336 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019943336 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17182112 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0490661 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 3.2008 17:56:19